public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP Build - Would it be possible to handle testcase	build failures without failing all the build process?
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:21:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246895464.4887.55.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907060426.57132.vapier@gentoo.org>

On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 04:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: 
> On Monday 06 July 2009 03:07:56 Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > LTP does have a large amount of testcases, and most of the testcases are
> > independent from each other, thus IMHO, a single compilation failure
> > should not fail the whole build process, instead, the tests that could
> > not be compiled should be marked as BROKEN, and should not be executed
> > during LTP execution.

Yes, that would be great. And for that an m4 rule file has to be written
for each and every LTP test, checking:
1) Header dependency,
2) Library dependency, etc
before compiling.

Regards--
Subrata

> >
> > Do we have any plans to handle individual build failures in a way that
> > doesn't fail the whole build process?
> 
> use the -k option with make
> -mike
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

      reply	other threads:[~2009-07-06 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-06  7:07 [LTP] LTP Build - Would it be possible to handle testcase build failures without failing all the build process? Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2009-07-06  8:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-06 15:51   ` Subrata Modak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1246895464.4887.55.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=lmr@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox