From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-4.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.124] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by h25xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MNqTo-0005DB-F9 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:51:44 +0000 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]) by 1b2kzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1MNqTn-0002oI-Uk for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:51:44 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n66Fo5bT018733 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:50:05 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n66FpUrF233918 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:51:32 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n66FpKJV024557 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:51:20 -0600 From: Subrata Modak In-Reply-To: <200907060426.57132.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1246864076.2865.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200907060426.57132.vapier@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:21:04 +0530 Message-Id: <1246895464.4887.55.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP Build - Would it be possible to handle testcase build failures without failing all the build process? Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Mike Frysinger On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 04:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 06 July 2009 03:07:56 Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > > LTP does have a large amount of testcases, and most of the testcases are > > independent from each other, thus IMHO, a single compilation failure > > should not fail the whole build process, instead, the tests that could > > not be compiled should be marked as BROKEN, and should not be executed > > during LTP execution. Yes, that would be great. And for that an m4 rule file has to be written for each and every LTP test, checking: 1) Header dependency, 2) Library dependency, etc before compiling. Regards-- Subrata > > > > Do we have any plans to handle individual build failures in a way that > > doesn't fail the whole build process? > > use the -k option with make > -mike > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list