public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>, Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LTP-ML <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Bhaskar Rangaswamy <bharanga@in.ibm.com>,
	"Iranna D. Ankad" <iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Pradeep kumar Surisetty <pradeepkumars@in.ibm.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Santwana Samantray <santwana.samantray@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Add new testcases for ext4 new features - V3
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:05:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256650551.4957.33.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C3A9583B-F6C5-4BCC-8D7E-876FA4D62D57@sun.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9540 bytes --]

Hi Andreas,

Thanks for taking a look and clarifying the issues.

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 16:15 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2009-10-26, at 07:26, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > We had recently added EXT4 testcases to LTP. As the author of these
> > tests mentioned, we saw 2 such failures in subdirectory limit test:
> >
> > Ext4 subdir limit test
> > ext4-subdir-limit    0  TINFO  :  Num of dirs to create: 65537, Dir  
> > name
> > len: short name                        Parent dir: mnt_point, Block
> > size: 1024
> > mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
> > tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
> > Setting test filesystem flag
> > /dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4: The test_fs flag is set (and ext4 is  
> > available).
> > CLEARED.
> 
> You don't need to set the test_fs flag for modern ext4.

Miao,

Can we change this ?

> 
> > /dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4: clean, 10/8847360 files, 2297019/141557760
> > blocks
> > dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
> > ext4-subdir-limit    1  TPASS  :  ext4 subdir limit test pass
> > ext4-subdir-limit    0  TINFO  :  Num of dirs to create: 65537, Dir  
> > name
> > len: long name                         Parent dir: mnt_point, Block
> > size: 1024
> > mkdir: No space left on device
> > ext4-subdir-limit    2  TFAIL  :  failed to create directories - 19524
> > ext4-subdir-limit    0  TINFO  :  Num of dirs to create: 65537, Dir  
> > name
> > len: short name                        Parent dir: mnt_point/sub,  
> > Block
> > size: 1024
> > mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
> > tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
> > Setting test filesystem flag
> > /dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4: The test_fs flag is set (and ext4 is  
> > available).
> > CLEARED.
> > /dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4: clean, 12/8847360 files, 2297037/141557760
> > blocks
> > dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
> > ext4-subdir-limit    3  TPASS  :  ext4 subdir limit test pass
> > ext4-subdir-limit    0  TINFO  :  Num of dirs to create: 65537, Dir  
> > name
> > len: long name                         Parent dir: mnt_point/sub,  
> > Block
> > size: 1024
> > mkdir: No space left on device
> > ext4-subdir-limit    4  TFAIL  :  failed to create directories - 19483
> > ext4-subdir-limit    0  TINFO  :  Num of dirs to create: 65537, Dir  
> > name
> > len: short name                        Parent dir: mnt_point, Block
> > size: 2048
> >
> > Is this a known issue for EXT4 ?
> 
> Creating many long filenames (255 bytes) in a 1kB block filesystem is a
> known issue that is not expected to be fixed (at least I'm not aware of
> any work being done in this area).  A vast majority of filesystems
> today are formatted with 4kB blocks (due to disk size) and the  
> overhead of
> managing 1kB block filesystems makes these only marginally used, and it
> is also very rare to have applications with such large filenames.

Ok.

> 
> > We also uncovered that the tests gives a decent 50% lines and over 61%
> > function coverage for EXT4 code. Please find the individual coverage
> > under EXT4 attached.
> 
> Interesting to see this.

And the good news continues. I did a complete run of the tests this
time. Unlike last time where it was running for more than 48 hours owing
to huge FS size(680GB), i ran it on a small 135GB partition this time.
It took around 40 hours completing the entire run which also include the
online-defrag tests. Guess, the new Code Coverage results are:

Lines:		56.1%,
Functions:	66.4%,

However, it is also accompanied by the following failures in the online-defrag part:
========================================================================================
ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 1, defrag obj: 3, block size: 1024
mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
Setting test filesystem flag
dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
69630819+0 records in
69630819+0 records out
71301958656 bytes (71 GB) copied, 2694.12 s, 26.5 MB/s
ext4-online-defrag    3  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 2, defrag obj: 1, block size: 1024
mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
...
ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 2, defrag obj: 3, block size: 1024
mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
Setting test filesystem flag
dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
69630819+0 records in
69630819+0 records out
71301958656 bytes (71 GB) copied, 2623.31 s, 27.2 MB/s
ext4-online-defrag    6  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 1, block size: 1024
mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
Setting test filesystem flag
File is not regular file
 "/dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4"
ext4-online-defrag    7  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 2, block size: 1024
mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
Setting test filesystem flag
40+0 records in
40+0 records out
41943040 bytes (42 MB) copied, 0.737014 s, 56.9 MB/s
write: Success
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1             25798712  10581072  13907140  44% /
udev                   1028576       152   1028424   1% /dev
/dev/sda2              4127108    126572   3790888   4% /boot
/dev/mapper/VG_EXT3_TO_EXT4_MIGRATION_TEST1-LV_EXT3_TO_EXT4_MIGRATION_TEST2
                      10321208    154100   9642820   2% /MY_EXT4
/dev/mapper/VG_EXT3_TO_EXT4_MIGRATION_TEST1-LV_EXT3_TO_EXT4_MIGRATION_TEST1
                      10321208    154232   9642688   2% /MY_EXT3
/dev/mapper/VG1_EXT4-LV1_EXT4
                     139299998 139259037     40961 100% /root/subrata/ltp/ltp-full-20090930/testcases/bin/mnt_point
File is not regular file
 "/dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4"
ext4-online-defrag    8  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 3, block size: 1024
mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
Setting test filesystem flag
dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
69630819+0 records in
69630819+0 records out
71301958656 bytes (71 GB) copied, 2544.39 s, 28.0 MB/s
File is not regular file
 "/dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4"
ext4-online-defrag    9  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
...
ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 2, block size: 4096
mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
Setting test filesystem flag
40+0 records in
40+0 records out
41943040 bytes (42 MB) copied, 0.306366 s, 137 MB/s
write: Success
write: Success
write: Success
write: Success
write: Success
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1             25798712  11441524  13046688  47% /
udev                   1028576       152   1028424   1% /dev
/dev/sda2              4127108    126572   3790888   4% /boot
/dev/mapper/VG_EXT3_TO_EXT4_MIGRATION_TEST1-LV_EXT3_TO_EXT4_MIGRATION_TEST2
                      10321208    154100   9642820   2% /MY_EXT4
/dev/mapper/VG_EXT3_TO_EXT4_MIGRATION_TEST1-LV_EXT3_TO_EXT4_MIGRATION_TEST1
                      10321208    154232   9642688   2% /MY_EXT3
/dev/mapper/VG1_EXT4-LV1_EXT4
                     139336680 139295720     40960 100% /root/subrata/ltp/ltp-full-20090930/testcases/bin/mnt_point
File is not regular file
 "/dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4"
ext4-online-defrag   17  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
ext4-online-defrag    0  TINFO  :  defrag type: 3, defrag obj: 3, block size: 4096
mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
tune2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
Setting test filesystem flag
dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
17392985+0 records in
17392985+0 records out
71241666560 bytes (71 GB) copied, 1019.79 s, 69.9 MB/s
File is not regular file
 "/dev/VG1_EXT4/LV1_EXT4"
ext4-online-defrag   18  TFAIL  :  e4defrag returned failure
incrementing stop
========================================================================================

Miao,

Did you see these failure on your machine ?
Some more points are:

     1. Can you please run these tests against the backdrop of the
        Makefile changes in LTP to see all the build/install/run are
        executing fine,
     2. Can you also please put all the utilities version info at the
        beginning of the test rather than printing them again and
        again(like mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009),tune2fs 1.41.9
        (22-Aug-2009),dumpe2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009),dumpe2fs 1.41.9
        (22-Aug-2009))

Regards--
Subrata

> 
> > Following the various system information on which we ran the test:
> > 1) uname -a
> > Linux 2.6.31 #1 SMP Tue Oct 20 22:57:16 IST 2009 i686 i686 i386
> > GNU/Linux
> >
> > 2) grep -i ext4 .config
> > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m
> > CONFIG_EXT4DEV_COMPAT=y
> > CONFIG_EXT4_FS_XATTR=y
> > CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
> > CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y
> >
> > 3) mkfs.ext4 -V
> > mke2fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
> >        Using EXT2FS Library version 1.41.9
> > e2fsprogs-1.41.9
> > e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9
> >
> > 4) LTP used:
> > Unreleased CVS repository. See the URL below to download:
> > http://ltp.sourceforge.net/documentation/how-to/ltp.php#_3.1,
> >
> > You can also also directly review the attached patch(which added this
> > test cases):
> > 26_10_2009-(Miao-Xie<miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>)- 
> > Add_new_testcases_for_ext4_new_features_V3.patch.regenerated,
> >
> > 5) I used a single 680GB LVM partition to test this.
> >
> > Kindly let us know your thoughts on this failures.
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
> 

[-- Attachment #2: ext4-on-135GB-LVM_LTP-Test_Coverage_2.6.31-kernel_complete.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 67703 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: EXT4-on-135GB-LVM_LTP-Test_2.6.31-KERNEL_RESULTS.tgz --]
[-- Type: application/x-compressed-tar, Size: 1299380 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 399 bytes --]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference

[-- Attachment #5: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-27 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-26  7:12 [LTP] [PATCH] Add new testcases for ext4 new features - V3 Miao Xie
2009-10-26  7:28 ` Miao Xie
2009-10-26  8:29   ` Subrata Modak
2009-10-26 13:26   ` Subrata Modak
2009-10-26 13:26 ` Subrata Modak
2009-10-26 22:15   ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-27 13:35     ` Subrata Modak [this message]
2009-10-29 18:31       ` Subrata Modak
2009-11-02 13:59         ` Subrata Modak
2009-11-26 12:02           ` Miao Xie
2009-12-03 15:11             ` Subrata Modak
2009-12-04 10:04               ` Miao Xie
2009-12-07 11:53                 ` Subrata Modak
2009-12-08  5:59                   ` Miao Xie
2009-12-09 12:13                     ` Subrata Modak
2009-11-30  3:28           ` Miao Xie
2009-11-30  9:39             ` Miao Xie
2009-11-30 10:01               ` Garrett Cooper
2009-11-03  2:47         ` Miao Xie
2009-11-09 17:39           ` Subrata Modak
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-07 13:29 naresh kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1256650551.4957.33.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharanga@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=pradeepkumars@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=santwana.samantray@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox