From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: LTP-ML <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fix the bug of the smaller cpu_set_t's length in sched_getaffinity01
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:36:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262862386.12213.25.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4403A8.2040502@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:29 +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> sched_getaffinity01 test failed because the len of cpu_set_t in the glibc is smaller than
> the length of the cpumask in the kernel. So we must use the dynamically sized CPU sets instead
> of the standard cpu_set_t.
>
> This patch fix this problem.
> Before using this patch, the test result is following:
> sched_getaffinity01 0 TINFO : system has 4 processor(s).
> sched_getaffinity01 1 TPASS : sched_getaffinity(0, len, (cpu_set_t *)-1): TEST_ERRNO=EINVAL(22): Invalid argument
> sched_getaffinity01 2 TPASS : sched_getaffinity(0, 0, &mask): TEST_ERRNO=EINVAL(22): Invalid argument
> sched_getaffinity01 3 TPASS : sched_getaffinity(getpid() + 1, len, &mask): TEST_ERRNO=EINVAL(22): Invalid argument
> sched_getaffinity01 4 TFAIL : could not get cpu affinity: TEST_ERRNO=EINVAL(22): Invalid argument
>
> The subcases1-3 of this test also failed though they were successful according to the log.
> Becuase the errnos returned were wrong.
>
> After using this patch, the test result is following:
> sched_getaffinity01 0 TINFO : system has 4 processor(s).
> sched_getaffinity01 0 TINFO : cpusetsize is 512
> sched_getaffinity01 0 TINFO : mask.__bits[0] = 15
> sched_getaffinity01 1 TPASS : sched_getaffinity() succeed ,this process 2239 is running processor: 0
> sched_getaffinity01 2 TPASS : sched_getaffinity() succeed ,this process 2239 is running processor: 1
> sched_getaffinity01 3 TPASS : sched_getaffinity() succeed ,this process 2239 is running processor: 2
> sched_getaffinity01 4 TPASS : sched_getaffinity() succeed ,this process 2239 is running processor: 3
> sched_getaffinity01 5 TPASS : sched_getaffinity(0, len, (cpu_set_t *)-1): TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
> sched_getaffinity01 6 TPASS : sched_getaffinity(0, 0, mask): TEST_ERRNO=EINVAL(22): Invalid argument
> sched_getaffinity01 7 TPASS : sched_getaffinity(getpid() + 1, len, mask): TEST_ERRNO=ESRCH(3): No such process
>
> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Thanks.
Regards--
Subrata
> ---
> .../sched_getaffinity/sched_getaffinity01.c | 81 +++++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sched_getaffinity/sched_getaffinity01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sched_getaffinity/sched_getaffinity01.c
> index 7c4a254..7dfb0ec 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sched_getaffinity/sched_getaffinity01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sched_getaffinity/sched_getaffinity01.c
> @@ -119,11 +119,15 @@ do { \
> tst_resm((TEST_RETURN == -1 ? TPASS : TFAIL) | TTERRNO, #t); \
> } while (0)
>
> +#if !(__GLIBC_PREREQ(2,7))
> +#define CPU_FREE(ptr) free(ptr)
> +#endif
> int main(int ac, char **av) {
> int lc,num,i; /* loop counter */
> char *msg; /* message returned from parse_opts */
> - cpu_set_t mask;
> - unsigned int len = sizeof(cpu_set_t);
> + cpu_set_t *mask;
> + int nrcpus = 1024;
> + unsigned int len;
>
> /* parse standard options */
> if ((msg = parse_opts(ac, av, (option_t *)NULL, NULL)) != (char *)NULL){
> @@ -140,30 +144,67 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) {
> for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); ++lc) {
> Tst_count = 0;
> for (testno = 0; testno < TST_TOTAL; ++testno) {
> - QUICK_TEST(sched_getaffinity(0, len, (cpu_set_t *)-1));
> - QUICK_TEST(sched_getaffinity(0, 0, &mask));
> - QUICK_TEST(sched_getaffinity(getpid() + 1, len, &mask));
> -
> - CPU_ZERO(&mask); //clear
> - TEST(sched_getaffinity(0,len,&mask)); //call sched_getaffinity()
> +#if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2,7)
> +realloc:
> + mask = CPU_ALLOC(nrcpus);
> +# else
> + mask = malloc(sizeof(cpu_set_t));
> +#endif
> + if (mask == NULL) {
> + tst_resm(TFAIL|TTERRNO, "cann't get enough memory");
> + cleanup();
> + tst_exit();
> + }
> +
> +#if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2,7)
> + len = CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(nrcpus);
> + CPU_ZERO_S(len, mask); //clear
> +#else
> + len = sizeof(cpu_set_t);
> + CPU_ZERO(mask); //clear
> +#endif
> + TEST(sched_getaffinity(0, len, mask)); //call sched_getaffinity()
> if(TEST_RETURN == -1) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL|TTERRNO, "could not get cpu affinity");
> - cleanup();
> - tst_exit();
> + CPU_FREE(mask);
> +#if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2,7)
> + if (errno == EINVAL && nrcpus < (1024 << 8)) {
> + nrcpus = nrcpus << 2;
> + goto realloc;
> + }
> +#else
> + if (errno == EINVAL)
> + tst_resm(TFAIL, "NR_CPUS of the kernel is more than 1024, so we'd better use a newer glibc(>= 2.7)");
> + else
> +#endif
> + tst_resm(TFAIL|TTERRNO, "could not get cpu affinity");
> + cleanup();
> + tst_exit();
> } else {
> tst_resm(TINFO,"cpusetsize is %d", len);
> - tst_resm(TINFO,"mask.__bits[0] = %lu ",mask.__bits[0]);
> + tst_resm(TINFO,"mask.__bits[0] = %lu ",mask->__bits[0]);
> for(i=0;i<num;i++){ // check the processor
> - TEST(CPU_ISSET(i,&mask));
> +#if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2,7)
> + TEST(CPU_ISSET_S(i, len, mask));
> +#else
> + TEST(CPU_ISSET(i, mask));
> +#endif
> if (TEST_RETURN != -1 ){
> tst_resm(TPASS,"sched_getaffinity() succeed ,this process %d is running processor: %d",getpid(), i);
> - }
> - }
> - }
> -
> -
> - }
> - }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> +#if __GLIBC_PREREQ(2,7)
> + CPU_ZERO_S(len, mask); //clear
> +#else
> + CPU_ZERO(mask); //clear
> +#endif
> + QUICK_TEST(sched_getaffinity(0, len, (cpu_set_t *)-1));
> + QUICK_TEST(sched_getaffinity(0, 0, mask));
> + QUICK_TEST(sched_getaffinity(getpid() + 1, len, mask));
> + CPU_FREE(mask);
> + }
> + }
> cleanup();
> tst_exit();
> }
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-07 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-06 3:29 [LTP] [PATCH] fix the bug of the smaller cpu_set_t's length in sched_getaffinity01 Miao Xie
2010-01-07 11:06 ` Subrata Modak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1262862386.12213.25.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox