From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: sukadev <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Test Project <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [06/12 FAILURE] Many CONTAINER tests of LTP fail
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:10:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280252447.7374.5.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q2z364299f41005061053zcc57d5c4gc5577e9d80ffc8e5@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Suka,
Some issues continue to exist in latest LTP. Do you have proposal for
them:
<<<test_start>>>
tag=Containers stime=1280251869
cmdline="container_test.sh"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
incrementing stop
Running utsns tests.
unshare tests
test 1 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 1 (unshare): success
test 2 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 2 (unshare): success
test 3 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 3 (unshare): success
test 4 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 4 (unshare): successful
test 5 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : P2: P1 claims error
clone tests
test 1 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 1 (clone): success
test 2 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 2 (clone): success
test 3 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 3 (clone): success
test 4 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 4 (clone): successful
test 5 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : P2: P1 claims error
Running ipcns tests.
****************** sysvipc tests ******************
sysvipc: SharedMemory none
sysvipc_namespace 0 TINFO : shmid namespaces test : none
sysvipc_namespace 1 TPASS : plain cloned process found shmid
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : none
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create shared mem segment
shmem_2nstest 1 TPASS : Plain cloned process able to access shmem
segment created
sysvipc: SharedMemory clone
sysvipc_namespace 0 TINFO : shmid namespaces test : clone
sysvipc_namespace 1 TPASS : clone: child process didn't find shmid
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : clone
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create shared mem segment
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont2: Able to allocate shmem seg with the
same key
shmem_2nstest 1 TPASS : clone : In namespace2 unable to access the
shmem seg created in Namespace1
sysvipc: SharedMemory unshare
sysvipc_namespace 0 TINFO : shmid namespaces test : unshare
sysvipc_namespace 1 TPASS : unshare: child process didn't find
shmid
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : unshare
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create shared mem segment
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont2: Able to allocate shmem seg with the
same key
shmem_2nstest 1 TPASS : unshare : In namespace2 unable to access
the shmem seg created in Namespace1
sysvipc: MesgQ none
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : mesgq namespaces test : none
mesgq_nstest 1 TPASS : Plain cloned process found mesgq inside
container
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : Mesg read of 18 bytes; Type 5: Msg: Message
of type 5!
sysvipc: MesgQ clone
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : mesgq namespaces test : clone
mesgq_nstest 1 TPASS : clone: Container didn't find mesgq
sysvipc: MesgQ unshare
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : mesgq namespaces test : unshare
mesgq_nstest 1 TPASS : unshare: Container didn't find mesgq
sysvipc: Semaphore none
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : Semaphore namespaces Isolation test : none
sem_nstest 1 TPASS : Plain cloned process found semaphore inside
container
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : PID 25710: Fetched existing semaphore..id = 0
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : none
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Sem1: File locked, Critical section is
updated...
semtest_2ns 1 TPASS : Plain cloned process able to access the
semaphore created
sysvipc: Semaphore clone
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : Semaphore namespaces Isolation test : clone
sem_nstest 1 TPASS : clone: Container didn't find semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : clone
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont2: Able to create semaphore with sameKey
semtest_2ns 1 TPASS : clone : In namespace2 unable to access the
semaphore created in Namespace1
sysvipc: Semaphore unshare
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : Semaphore namespaces Isolation test : unshare
sem_nstest 1 TPASS : unshare: Container didn't find semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : unshare
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont2: Able to create semaphore with sameKey
semtest_2ns 1 TPASS : unshare : In namespace2 unable to access the
semaphore created in Namespace1
Running pidns tests.
pid_namespace1 0 TINFO : PIDNS test is running inside container
pid_namespace1 1 TPASS : Success:
pid_namespace2 0 TINFO : Checking session id & group id inside
container
pid_namespace2 1 TPASS : Success: Got Group ID = 1 & Session ID =
1
pid_namespace3 0 TINFO : Checking pid for parent ns and
container-init
Parent namespace pid = 25731,container
parent pid = 0,and container pid = 1
pid_namespace3 1 TFAIL : Failed to open /proc directory
pid_namespace4 0 TINFO : PIDNS test is running inside container
pid_namespace4 1 TPASS : Container init : I was not killed !
pidns05 0 TINFO : 5 Nested Containers are created
pidns05 1 TPASS : The number of containers killed are 2
pidns06 0 TINFO : Parent: Passing the pid of the process 25742
pidns06 1 TPASS : Container: tried kill() on the parent pid
25742: errno set to 3 (No such process), as expected
pidns06 2 TPASS : Container: While killing non existent pid errno
set to 3 : No such process, as expected
pidns30 0 TINFO : parent: successfully created posix mqueue
pidns30 0 TINFO : cinit: mq_open succeeded
pidns30 0 TINFO : cinit: successfully registered for notification
pidns30 0 TINFO : cinit: successfully registered handler for
SIGUSR1
pidns30 1 TPASS : cinit: signal originator PID = 0
pidns30 0 TINFO : parent: mq_send() succeeded
pidns30 0 TINFO : cinit: my father is done - cleaning
pidns31 1 TBROK : parent: mq_open() failed (Permission denied)
pidns10 1 TPASS : cinit: expected kill(-1, sig) failure.
pidns12 0 TINFO : parent: PID is 25749
pidns12 1 TPASS : cinit: signalling PID (from other namespace) is
0 as expected
pidns13 0 TINFO : cinit1: setup handler for async I/O on pipe
pidns13 0 TINFO : cinit2: writing some data in pipe
pidns13 1 TPASS : cinit1: si_fd is 5, si_code is 1
pidns16 1 TBROK : Unexpected value for Sending-ProcessID when
signal handler called 0
pidns16 0 TINFO : Container: Resumed after receiving SIGUSR1 from
parentNS
pidns16 0 TINFO : sig_handler is signalled from pid 1
pidns16 0 TINFO : Container: Resumed after sending SIGUSR1 from
container itself
pidns16 1 TPASS : container init continued successfuly, after
handling signal -USR1
pidns17 1 TPASS : cinit: all children are terminated.
pidns20 0 TINFO : cinit: blocked SIGUSR1
pidns20 0 TINFO : parent: signalled SIGUSR1 to container
pidns20 0 TINFO : cinit: unblocking SIGUSR1
pidns20 1 TPASS : cinit: user function is called as expected
Running POSIX message queue tests.
posixmq_namespace_01 0 TINFO : Testing posix mq namespaces through
unshare(2).
posixmq_namespace_01 0 TINFO : Checking namespaces isolation from
parent to child
posixmq_namespace_01 1 TPASS : child process didn't find mqueue
posixmq_namespace_01 0 TINFO : Testing posix mq namespaces through
clone(2).
posixmq_namespace_01 0 TINFO : Checking namespaces isolation from
parent to child
posixmq_namespace_01 1 TPASS : child process didn't find mqueue
posixmq_namespace_02 0 TINFO : Testing posix mq namespaces through
unshare(2).
posixmq_namespace_02 0 TINFO : Checking namespaces isolation
(child to parent)
posixmq_namespace_02 1 TPASS : Parent process can't see the mqueue
posixmq_namespace_02 0 TINFO : Testing posix mq namespaces through
clone(2).
posixmq_namespace_02 0 TINFO : Checking namespaces isolation
(child to parent)
posixmq_namespace_02 1 TPASS : Parent process can't see the mqueue
posixmq_namespace_03 0 TINFO : Testing posix mq namespaces through
unshare(2).
posixmq_namespace_03 0 TINFO : Checking correct umount+remount of
mqueuefs
posixmq_namespace_03 1 TPASS : umount+remount of mqueuefs
remounted the right fs
posixmq_namespace_03 0 TINFO : Testing posix mq namespaces through
clone(2).
posixmq_namespace_03 0 TINFO : Checking correct umount+remount of
mqueuefs
posixmq_namespace_03 1 TPASS : umount+remount of mqueuefs
remounted the right fs
posixmq_namespace_04 0 TINFO : Testing posix mq namespaces through
unshare(2).
posixmq_namespace_04 0 TINFO : Checking mqueue filesystem lifetime
posixmq_namespace_04 1 TPASS : Child mqueue fs still visible for
parent
posixmq_namespace_04 0 TINFO : Testing posix mq namespaces through
clone(2).
posixmq_namespace_04 0 TINFO : Checking mqueue filesystem lifetime
posixmq_namespace_04 1 TPASS : Child mqueue fs still visible for
parent
Running netns tests.
parentns.sh 0 TINFO : PASS: Pinging ChildNS from ParentNS
childns.sh 0 TINFO : PASS: Pinging ParentNS from ChildNS
crtchild: PASS
child_2.sh 0 TINFO : PASS: CHILD1 is pinging from CHILD2 !
child_1.sh 0 TINFO : PASS: Child2 is pinging from CHILD1 !
two_children_ns: PASS
childns.sh 0 TINFO : Successfully Renamed device to veth2
Files /tmp/sys_b4_child_killed and /tmp/sys_aftr_child_killed differ
Cannot find device "veth0"
crtchild_delchild: PASS
paripv6.sh 0 TINFO : IPv6: Pinging child from parent: PASS
childipv6.sh 0 TINFO : IPv6: Pinging Parent from Child: PASS
par_chld_ipv6: PASS
parentns.sh 0 TINFO : Pinging ChildNS from ParentNS
Error: Can't ftp to 192.168.0.181: Connection refused
childns.sh 1 TFAIL : ftp failed
Error while running the script
par_chld_ftp: FAIL 1 ;
<<<execution_status>>>
initiation_status="ok"
duration=47 termination_type=exited termination_id=1 corefile=no
cutime=20 cstime=112
<<<test_end>>>
/opt/ltp/testcases/bin/initialize.sh: line 83: 57 Terminated
( ip link delete $netdev ) 2> /dev/null
INFO: ltp-pan reported some tests FAIL
LTP Version: LTP-20100630
###############################################################"
Done executing testcases."
LTP Version: LTP-20100630
###############################################################"
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 10:53 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Clipping the output to denote the failures.
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Subrata Modak
> <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Subject:Many CONTAINER tests of LTP fail
> >
> > I know Serge and Dan is already working on it.
> >
> > Issues Description Below:
> > ====================================================
> > # ./runltp -f containers
> > <<<test_start>>>
>
> [...]
>
> > pid_namespace3 1 TFAIL : Failed to open /proc directory
>
> This is interesting... is /proc not mounted in the child container?
>
> > pidns30 1 TBROK : parent: mq_open() failed (Permission denied)
> > pidns31 1 TBROK : parent: mq_open() failed (Permission denied)
>
> Does the queue exist?
>
> > posixmq_namespace_01 1 TFAIL : mq_open failed
> > Running netns tests.
>
> [...]
>
> > netns_2children 1 TFAIL : Error while running the scripts
> > two_children_ns: return code is 1 ;
> > sshd re-exec requires execution with an absolute path^M
>
> This was going to be fixed with a patch proposed earlier.
>
> > childns.sh 0 TINFO : Successfully Renamed device to veth1
> > Files /tmp/sys_b4_child_killed and /tmp/sys_aftr_child_killed differ
> > Cannot find device "veth1"
> > crtchild_delchild: PASS
>
> This seems suspect even though it says passed.
>
> [...]
>
> > sshd re-exec requires execution with an absolute path^M
> > Error: Can't ftp to 192.168.0.181: Connection refused
> > childns.sh 1 TFAIL : ftp failed
>
> One of the prereqs is missing probably (setup an ftp daemon ... maybe
> this was going to be done via ssh?)
>
> [...]
>
> > <<<test_end>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;226879339;13503038;l?
http://clk.atdmt.com/CRS/go/247765532/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-28 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-06 6:55 [LTP] [00/12 FAILURE] Reporting LTP run issues on Fedora 13 ppc6 Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [01/12 FAILURE] LTPX Memory CGROUP test creates Call Trace and Badness at mm/oom_kill.c:393 Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [02/12 FAILURE] LTPX File Capabilities tests becomes defunct and does not complete beyond 12 hours Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [03/12 FAILURE] LTPX Memory Conroller test fails and hangs system for more than " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [04/12 FAILURE] LTPX sysctl03 test fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 8:05 ` [LTP] [04/12 FAILURE] LTP? " Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 13:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-05-06 17:38 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 17:55 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-05-06 17:59 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 18:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-05-07 9:05 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-07 9:22 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 6:57 ` [05/12 FAILURE] LTPX proc01 " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 8:04 ` [LTP] [05/12 FAILURE] LTP? " Garrett Cooper
2010-07-27 17:37 ` Subrata Modak
2010-07-27 17:38 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:57 ` [LTP] [06/12 FAILURE] Many CONTAINER tests of LTP fail Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 17:53 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 17:59 ` Dan Smith
2010-07-27 17:40 ` Subrata Modak [this message]
2010-05-06 6:57 ` [07/12 FAILURE] LTPX MEMORY CGROUP FUNCTION tests fails Subrata Modak
2010-07-28 17:34 ` [LTP] [07/12 FAILURE] LTPE " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [08/12 FAILURE] LTPX clock gettime03 fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 7:04 ` [LTP] [08/12 FAILURE] LTPE " Suzuki Poulose
2010-05-06 7:55 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 9:03 ` Suzuki Poulose
2010-05-06 17:42 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-07 8:53 ` Subrata Modak
2010-06-01 15:40 ` Suzuki Poulose
2010-06-02 12:57 ` Subrata Modak
2010-07-27 18:03 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [09/12 FAILURE] LTPX timer create04 fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-07 2:12 ` [LTP] [09/12 FAILURE] LTP " Henry xu
2010-07-28 12:46 ` [LTP] [09/12 FAILURE] LTPE " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [10/12 FAILURE] LTPX ar01 fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [11/12 FAILURE] LTPX file test fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 8:01 ` [LTP] [11/12 FAILURE] LTP? " Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 6:59 ` [12/12 FAILURE] LTPX cron tests fails Subrata Modak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1280252447.7374.5.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox