From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OseNY-0003m1-8q for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:17:08 +0000 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1OseNT-0004xq-7y for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:17:08 +0000 Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o86G4tBC021019 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:04:55 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o86GGvZk212642 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:16:57 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o86GGu1T003230 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:16:57 -0600 From: Subrata Modak In-Reply-To: References: <4C73452A.3020006@cn.fujitsu.com> <1282647771.4833.10.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <4C7470FC.4090800@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:46:40 +0530 Message-Id: <1283789802.4947.19.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Add ftrace-stress-test to LTP Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Garrett Cooper Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , Eugene Teo , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton Garret, Did you get a chance to review these tests further ? Regards-- Subrata On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 19:41 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Li Zefan wrote: > > Subrata Modak wrote: > >> Thanks. I need to test this on a suitable kernel. But doubtful if i can > >> add in the default run. > >> > > > > Why? Because it costs 90 secs? This is configurable, and some other > > test suites like cpuctl cost more time. > > > > If a test suite is not run by default, I guess people won't know its > > existence, probably. > > I think that more of the concern stems from the fact that it's a > performance test, and a lot of people complain if and when their test > machines slow down to a halt (take hackbench, proc01, for example). > > There are issues with the code, but it's dealing with the fact that > it's not really written in a portable way. Give me a bit of time and > I'll comment on what needs to be changed. > > Thanks, > -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list