From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PGr5G-0000RO-UV for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:42:18 +0000 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1PGr5F-0002xa-SN for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:42:18 +0000 Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oACAKlZR016981 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:20:47 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id oACAgCtB394890 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:42:12 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oACAgB8S019336 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:42:12 -0200 From: Subrata Modak In-Reply-To: References: <1289458673.5622.19.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:11:31 +0530 Message-Id: <1289558494.13890.3.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC] Remove testcases/pounder21 Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Garrett Cooper Cc: Iranna D Ankad , Shubham Goyal , takahash , LTP list On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:18 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Shubham Goyal wrote: > > Yes Iranna I agree with you and I also feel that "pounder21" tree should > > not be removed from LTP. As you correctly said currently its difficult to > > run LTP's pounder on stand alone systems due to some other helper files > > dependency. I will try to address this problem ASAP and try to make pounder > > run on stand alone systems without any other dependencies. I have it in my > > TODO list. > > Should it be moved to a separate module under LTP CVS? I would prefer to keep it in git for the time being. Let it be where it is. We will not try to integrate it inside LTP root Makefile, so, configure/make/make install will not interfere with pounder21 directory. Once Subham comes wiht the patch for generic build/install we can integrate it to LTP Makefile then. Since, the IBM distro test teams use both LTP and Pounder21, it would be much easier for them to access them from a single tarball :-) Regards-- Subrata > Thanks, > -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end client virtualization framework. Read more! http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list