From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Stancek Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:08:16 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [LTP] [PATCH ltp] runtest/{ltplite, stress.part1}: update commands for gf01-30/rwtest01-05 In-Reply-To: <20180726130439.GA12339@dell5510> References: <20180706084928.6017-1-yixin.zhang@intel.com> <20180726130439.GA12339@dell5510> Message-ID: <1362410165.36734032.1532956096134.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it ----- Original Message ----- > Hi Yixin, > > > gf01-30/rwtest01-05 are orignal defined in runtest file 'fs', and they > > are updated multiple times in file 'fs' but missed in > > 'ltplite'/'stress.part1'. > > So this patch copy all updates to the tests in 'ltplite'/'stress.part1'. > > > Ref: > > c9dd96e6b2f811dbad119c3558d90cb7dfc3919b > > 95e8b61433efcefb83699aaf859e92ad2b576373 > > 606e544932248858f65c7ab3061f77c542c07cfe > > > Signed-off-by: Yixin Zhang > > I wonder if we want to keep these runtest/stress.part[1-3] and > runtest/ltplite > files. ATM we don't have feature to include runtest files (among other > problems > with test runner), but keeping this duplicity doesn't look to me. In short-term though the patch looks OK to me. I ran a quick test too, all PASSed on 4.18.0-rc5. Regards, Jan > > > Kind regards, > Petr > > -- > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp >