From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 04:36:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/copy_file_range02: Add check for pipe
In-Reply-To: <20191008151624.19815-1-chrubis@suse.cz>
References: <20191008151624.19815-1-chrubis@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <1365327078.5308904.1570610176976.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 October, 2019 5:16:24 PM
> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/copy_file_range02: Add check for pipe
> 
> The original patch that was adding this fell under a table:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1112976/
> 
> I guess there is no harm checking that we get EINVAL for pipe as well,
> or does anyone disagree?

Do you know what is kernel behaviour prior to commit 11cbfb10775a ?
Does it pass/fail/crash/different errno?