public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] read_all: retry to queue work for any worker
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:29:48 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367025665.5372558.1570631388627.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009135656.GD7561@rei.lan>



----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> > +static void work_push_retry(int worker, const char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	int i, ret, worker_min, worker_max;
> > +
> > +	if (worker < 0) {
> > +		/* pick any, try -worker first */
> > +		worker_min = worker * (-1);
> > +		worker_max = worker_count;
> > +	} else {
> > +		/* keep trying worker */
> > +		worker_min = worker;
> > +		worker_max = worker + 1;
> > +	}
> > +	i = worker_min;
> > +
> > +	for (;;) {
> > +		ret = queue_push(workers[i].q, buf);
> > +		if (ret == 1)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		if (++i >= worker_max) {
> > +			i = worker_min;
> > +			usleep(100000);
> 
> 
> My only concern is that we sleep for too long here. Maybe we should
> start with smaller sleep here and increase it after a while.
> 
> Or have you checked that the tests runs as fast as if we had smaller
> sleep here?

Small benchmark shows that smaller sleep can complete faster. I'll send v2.

> 
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void stop_workers(void)
> >  {
> >  	const char stop_code[1] = { '\0' };
> > @@ -292,7 +319,7 @@ static void stop_workers(void)
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < worker_count; i++) {
> >  		if (workers[i].q)
> > -			TST_RETRY_FUNC(queue_push(workers[i].q, stop_code), 1);
> > +			work_push_retry(i, stop_code);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < worker_count; i++) {
> > @@ -310,7 +337,7 @@ static void rep_sched_work(const char *path, int rep)
> >  	for (i = j = 0; i < rep; i++, j++) {
> >  		if (j >= worker_count)
> >  			j = 0;
> > -		TST_RETRY_FUNC(queue_push(workers[j].q, path), 1);
> > +		work_push_retry(-j, path);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
> 
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09 10:29 [LTP] [PATCH] read_all: retry to queue work for any worker Jan Stancek
2019-10-09 13:56 ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-10-09 14:29   ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-10-09 14:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Jan Stancek
2019-10-09 15:26   ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-10-11  8:24   ` Li Wang
2019-10-12  5:58     ` Li Wang
2019-10-12  6:17       ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-12  6:35         ` Li Wang
2019-10-12  6:49           ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-12  7:28             ` Li Wang
2019-10-13  7:54               ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-14  6:31                 ` Li Wang
2019-10-15 14:15                   ` Jan Stancek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1367025665.5372558.1570631388627.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox