From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] read_all: retry to queue work for any worker
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:29:48 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367025665.5372558.1570631388627.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009135656.GD7561@rei.lan>
----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> > +static void work_push_retry(int worker, const char *buf)
> > +{
> > + int i, ret, worker_min, worker_max;
> > +
> > + if (worker < 0) {
> > + /* pick any, try -worker first */
> > + worker_min = worker * (-1);
> > + worker_max = worker_count;
> > + } else {
> > + /* keep trying worker */
> > + worker_min = worker;
> > + worker_max = worker + 1;
> > + }
> > + i = worker_min;
> > +
> > + for (;;) {
> > + ret = queue_push(workers[i].q, buf);
> > + if (ret == 1)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + if (++i >= worker_max) {
> > + i = worker_min;
> > + usleep(100000);
>
>
> My only concern is that we sleep for too long here. Maybe we should
> start with smaller sleep here and increase it after a while.
>
> Or have you checked that the tests runs as fast as if we had smaller
> sleep here?
Small benchmark shows that smaller sleep can complete faster. I'll send v2.
>
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void stop_workers(void)
> > {
> > const char stop_code[1] = { '\0' };
> > @@ -292,7 +319,7 @@ static void stop_workers(void)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < worker_count; i++) {
> > if (workers[i].q)
> > - TST_RETRY_FUNC(queue_push(workers[i].q, stop_code), 1);
> > + work_push_retry(i, stop_code);
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < worker_count; i++) {
> > @@ -310,7 +337,7 @@ static void rep_sched_work(const char *path, int rep)
> > for (i = j = 0; i < rep; i++, j++) {
> > if (j >= worker_count)
> > j = 0;
> > - TST_RETRY_FUNC(queue_push(workers[j].q, path), 1);
> > + work_push_retry(-j, path);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-09 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 10:29 [LTP] [PATCH] read_all: retry to queue work for any worker Jan Stancek
2019-10-09 13:56 ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-10-09 14:29 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-10-09 14:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Jan Stancek
2019-10-09 15:26 ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-10-11 8:24 ` Li Wang
2019-10-12 5:58 ` Li Wang
2019-10-12 6:17 ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-12 6:35 ` Li Wang
2019-10-12 6:49 ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-12 7:28 ` Li Wang
2019-10-13 7:54 ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-14 6:31 ` Li Wang
2019-10-15 14:15 ` Jan Stancek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367025665.5372558.1570631388627.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox