From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UjbfS-0007sy-Q6 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:47:50 +0000 Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1UjbfR-0003Vq-D0 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:47:50 +0000 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 16:47:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Jan Stancek Message-ID: <1492205844.3281606.1370292459997.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51A84F5A.9060708@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <51A5C347.4020202@cn.fujitsu.com> <1098836685.51729.1369819107988.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <51A5D7A9.3070801@cn.fujitsu.com> <577470418.347391.1369824283490.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <51A84F5A.9060708@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] shmget/shmget01.c: cleanup and attach SHM_NORESERVE to shmflg List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: DAN LI Cc: LTP list ----- Original Message ----- > From: "DAN LI" > To: "Jan Stancek" > Cc: "LTP list" > Sent: Friday, 31 May, 2013 9:20:58 AM > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] shmget/shmget01.c: cleanup and attach SHM_NORESERVE to shmflg > > On 05/29/2013 06:44 PM, Jan Stancek wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "DAN LI" > >> To: "Jan Stancek" > >> Cc: "LTP list" > >> Sent: Wednesday, 29 May, 2013 12:25:45 PM > >> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] shmget/shmget01.c: cleanup and attach > >> SHM_NORESERVE to shmflg > >> > >> On 05/29/2013 05:18 PM, Jan Stancek wrote: > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> From: "DAN LI" > >>>> To: "LTP list" > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 29 May, 2013 10:58:47 AM > >>>> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] shmget/shmget01.c: cleanup and attach > >>>> SHM_NORESERVE > >>>> to shmflg > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 1. Remove useless comments > >>>> > >>>> 2. Revise code to follow ltp-code-style > >>>> > >>>> 3. Add SHM_NORESERVE to shmflg to test > >>> > >>> Can you add some description why you are adding this flag? > >> > >> Actually, we are trying to complete test cases and expand > >> the test scope of LTP. > >> > >> So, it is just for completeness of this case. > > > > My concern here is: > > So if we add this flag, we cover SHM_NORESERVE path. > > Do we have a testcase which still covers current non-SHM_NORESERVE path? > > Hi Jan, > > Sorry for the late reply. :) > > In my opinion, SHM_NORESERVE is an independent feature of others and should > have > no effect on them, so we do not need a non-SHM_NORESERVE path. > They are like two branches of a river, one branch can do nothing on the other > one, > but if either of them goes wrong, the river will get feedback. Presence of that flag has some effect, absence has different one. To follow up on river metaphore, Are crocodiles in this river? Anyway, we cover that path in other testcases, so unless someone else objects, I'm OK with adding that flag. Regards, Jan > > And maybe, it's just what the author of this case considered since he tested > SHM_RW(S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR) together with IPC_CREAT | IPC_EXCL. > > > Regards, > DAN LI > > > > > Regards, > > Jan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services 3. A single system of record for all IT processes http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list