From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: LTP <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] pthread_rwlock_rdlock:2-1: do not test on glibc
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 04:28:00 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515555986.6425405.1374827280068.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F22AB9.6060109@cn.fujitsu.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wanlong Gao" <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: "LTP" <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Friday, 26 July, 2013 9:52:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pthread_rwlock_rdlock:2-1: do not test on glibc
>
> On 07/26/2013 03:07 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Wanlong Gao" <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> To: "LTP" <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
> >> Cc: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>, "Caspar Zhang"
> >> <caspar@casparzhang.com>, "Garrett Cooper" <yanegomi@gmail.com>,
> >> "Mike Frysinger" <vapier@gentoo.org>, jstancek@redhat.com, "Wanlong Gao"
> >> <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, 26 July, 2013 4:56:18 AM
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] pthread_rwlock_rdlock:2-1: do not test on glibc
> >>
> >> Since the reader can always acquire the rwlock if there's not a writer
> >> held the lock.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I agree that these 3 fail by default on glibc at the moment.
> > Since we are adding a GLIBC ifdef, I'm wondering if we could use
> > glibc specific api to change default behaviour with
> > pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np() and still run the testcase.
>
> The first 2 *_rdlock cases can change to WRITER_PREFER to let them pass,
> but the last *_unlock one can't, because *_unlock will choose the writer
> first without any care of the NP KIND.
> How about change the first two cases to WRITER_PREFER and just skip the third
> *_unlock one?
I agree with skipping third one and let's see what other guys think about first two.
When you say "WRITER_PREFER", is that an actual define on your system? Or just
a shortcut for PTHREAD_RWLOCK_PREFER_WRITER...?
Regards,
Jan
>
> Thanks,
> Wanlong Gao
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jan
> >
> >> ---
> >> .../conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c | 6
> >> ++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git
> >> a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c
> >> b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c
> >> index c6c1412..62a4b3b 100644
> >> ---
> >> a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c
> >> +++
> >> b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-1.c
> >> @@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ int main(void)
> >> return PTS_UNSUPPORTED;
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> +#ifdef __GLIBC__
> >> + printf("The reader can always acquire rwlock if there's"
> >> + " not a writer held this lock in glibc\n");
> >> + return PTS_UNTESTED;
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> int cnt = 0;
> >> pthread_t rd_thread, wr_thread;
> >> int priority;
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.3.754.g9c3c367
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-26 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1374807380-20319-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
2013-07-26 7:07 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] pthread_rwlock_rdlock:2-1: do not test on glibc Jan Stancek
2013-07-26 7:52 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-07-26 8:28 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2013-07-26 8:30 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-07-31 11:16 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <52836390.5080104@cn.fujitsu.com>
2013-11-13 15:13 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <52D5F124.3090204@cn.fujitsu.com>
2014-01-28 13:23 ` chrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1515555986.6425405.1374827280068.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox