From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite: add set_affinity_single()
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 08:41:15 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524656392.7427722.1447335675915.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151112130952.GB19653@rei.lan>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Thursday, 12 November, 2015 2:09:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite: add set_affinity_single()
>
> Hi!
> > +static int get_present_cpu_from_sysfs(void)
> > +{
> > + FILE *f;
> > + int cpu = -1;
> > +
> > + f = fopen("/sys/devices/system/cpu/present", "r");
> > + if (!f)
> > + return -1;
> > + fscanf(f, "%d", &cpu);
> > + fclose(f);
> > +
> > + return cpu;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int get_present_cpu_from_cpuinfo(void)
> > +{
> > + FILE *f;
> > + int cpu = -1;
> > + char line[4096];
> > +
> > + f = fopen("/proc/cpuinfo", "r");
> > + if (!f)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + while (!feof(f)) {
> > + if (!fgets(line, sizeof(line), f))
> > + return -1;
> > + /*
> > + * cpuinfo output is not consistent across all archictures,
> > + * it can be "processor : N", but for example on s390
> > + * it's: "processor N: ...", so ignore any non-number
> > + * after "processor"
> > + */
> > + if (sscanf(line, "processor%*[^0123456789]%d", &cpu) == 1)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + fclose(f);
> > +
> > + return cpu;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int set_affinity_single(void)
> > +{
> > + int cpu;
> > +
> > + cpu = get_present_cpu_from_sysfs();
> > + if (cpu < 0)
> > + cpu = get_present_cpu_from_cpuinfo();
>
> We should probably fallback here to cpu = 0 in case that we have failed
> to parse the cpuinfo. Not that it's likely to happen.
>
> So I would do here:
>
> cpu = get_present_cpu_from_sysfs();
>
> if (cpu >= 0)
> goto set_affinity;
>
> cpu = get_present_cpu_from_cpuinfo();
>
> if (cpu >= 0)
> goto set_affinity;
>
> fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Failed to detect present cpu using cpu=0\n");
>
> cpu = 0;
>
> set_affinity:
> return set_affinity(cpu);
>
> > + return set_affinity(cpu);
> > +}
> > +
> > #else
> > static int set_affinity(int cpu)
> ^
> You should also rename this stub for
> non-linux OSes.
>
> Otherwise it looks good, acked.
Pushed with changes you suggested.
Regards,
Jan
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-12 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-12 12:45 [LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite: add set_affinity_single() Jan Stancek
2015-11-12 13:05 ` Jan Stancek
2015-11-12 13:09 ` Cyril Hrubis
2015-11-12 13:41 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524656392.7427722.1447335675915.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox