Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite: add set_affinity_single()
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 08:41:15 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524656392.7427722.1447335675915.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151112130952.GB19653@rei.lan>



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Thursday, 12 November, 2015 2:09:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite: add set_affinity_single()
> 
> Hi!
> > +static int get_present_cpu_from_sysfs(void)
> > +{
> > +	FILE *f;
> > +	int cpu = -1;
> > +
> > +	f = fopen("/sys/devices/system/cpu/present", "r");
> > +	if (!f)
> > +		return -1;
> > +	fscanf(f, "%d", &cpu);
> > +	fclose(f);
> > +
> > +	return cpu;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int get_present_cpu_from_cpuinfo(void)
> > +{
> > +	FILE *f;
> > +	int cpu = -1;
> > +	char line[4096];
> > +
> > +	f = fopen("/proc/cpuinfo", "r");
> > +	if (!f)
> > +		return -1;
> > +
> > +	while (!feof(f)) {
> > +		if (!fgets(line, sizeof(line), f))
> > +			return -1;
> > +		/*
> > +		 * cpuinfo output is not consistent across all archictures,
> > +		 * it can be "processor        : N", but for example on s390
> > +		 * it's: "processor N: ...", so ignore any non-number
> > +		 * after "processor"
> > +		 */
> > +		if (sscanf(line, "processor%*[^0123456789]%d", &cpu) == 1)
> > +			break;
> > +	}
> > +	fclose(f);
> > +
> > +	return cpu;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int set_affinity_single(void)
> > +{
> > +	int cpu;
> > +
> > +	cpu = get_present_cpu_from_sysfs();
> > +	if (cpu < 0)
> > +		cpu = get_present_cpu_from_cpuinfo();
> 
> We should probably fallback here to cpu = 0 in case that we have failed
> to parse the cpuinfo. Not that it's likely to happen.
> 
> So I would do here:
> 
> 	cpu = get_present_cpu_from_sysfs();
> 
> 	if (cpu >= 0)
> 		goto set_affinity;
> 
> 	cpu = get_present_cpu_from_cpuinfo();
> 
> 	if (cpu >= 0)
> 		goto set_affinity;
> 
> 	fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Failed to detect present cpu using cpu=0\n");
> 
> 	cpu = 0;
> 
> set_affinity:
> 	return set_affinity(cpu);
> 
> > +	return set_affinity(cpu);
> > +}
> > +
> >  #else
> >  static int set_affinity(int cpu)
>                             ^
> 			    You should also rename this stub for
> 			    non-linux OSes.
> 
> Otherwise it looks good, acked.

Pushed with changes you suggested.

Regards,
Jan

> 
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-12 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-12 12:45 [LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite: add set_affinity_single() Jan Stancek
2015-11-12 13:05 ` Jan Stancek
2015-11-12 13:09 ` Cyril Hrubis
2015-11-12 13:41   ` Jan Stancek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1524656392.7427722.1447335675915.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox