[LTP] [PATCH 1/1] request_key04: Use TFAIL instead of TBROK

[Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>]

----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> > > In personally, I'd let tst_res() only accept 'TPASS, TFAIL, TINFO, TCONF,
> > > TWARN'.
> > +1. Cyril, Jan?
> 
> I guess that it does not make much sense to report TBROK and then
> continue the test. But that all depends on how exactly are these states
> defined. Have we ever wrote them down?
> 
> I guess that TPASS and TFAIL are obvious.
> 
> TINFO is just additional information.
> 
> TCONF is test skipped.
> 
> TWARN something went wrong but we decided to continue?

This appears to be mostly used in cleanup() when something goes wrong.
So a failure that's not critical, not related to goal of test,
but still something we want to draw attention to.

> 
> TBROK something went wrong and we decided to exit?

We do have following in style-guide.txt:

Use +TBROK+ when an unexpected failure unrelated to the goal of the testcase
occurred, and use +TFAIL+ when an unexpected failure related to the goal of
the testcase occurred.

I agree that tst_res with TBROK doesn't make much sense. I see TBROK as
something we can't recover from and need to end the test. Otherwise
if we want to skip part of test, then TCONF looks more fitting.