From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/execveat03: Fix compiler errors
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 08:02:43 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1642007852.41615039.1534852963645.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1534740597-4896-1-git-send-email-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
----- Original Message -----
> According to open(2) and linkat(2) manpages, O_PATH and AT_EMPTY_PATH
> flags were added since kernel v2.6.39, so these undefined flags led
> to the following errors on older kernels(e.g. v2.6.32):
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> execveat03.c:66: error: ‘O_PATH’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> execveat03.c:69: error: ‘AT_EMPTY_PATH’ undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> 1) Add AT_EMPTY_PATH into lapi/fcntl.h
> 2) Include lapi/fcntl.h in execveat03.c
Agreed with 1 and 2.
> 3) Check if open(2) supports O_PATH
Do we need to worry about this one? execveat() has been introduced [1]
around v3.19. Those kernels should already support O_PATH.
[1] 51f39a1f0cea ("syscalls: implement execveat() system call")
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/lapi/fcntl.h | 4 ++++
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/execveat/execveat03.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/lapi/fcntl.h b/include/lapi/fcntl.h
> index 849439d..358230f 100644
> --- a/include/lapi/fcntl.h
> +++ b/include/lapi/fcntl.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,10 @@
> # define AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW 0x100
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef AT_EMPTY_PATH
> +# define AT_EMPTY_PATH 0x1000
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef AT_REMOVEDIR
> # define AT_REMOVEDIR 0x200
> #endif
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/execveat/execveat03.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/execveat/execveat03.c
> index df27273..701784e 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/execveat/execveat03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/execveat/execveat03.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include "tst_test.h"
> #include "lapi/execveat.h"
> +#include "lapi/fcntl.h"
>
> #define OVL_MNT "ovl"
> #define TEST_APP "execveat_child"
> @@ -63,7 +64,14 @@ static void do_child(void)
>
> SAFE_CP(TEST_APP, TEST_FILE_PATH);
>
> - fd = SAFE_OPEN(TEST_FILE_PATH, O_PATH);
> + fd = open(TEST_FILE_PATH, O_PATH);
> + if (fd == -1) {
> + if (errno == EINVAL)
> + tst_brk(TCONF, "open() did not support O_PATH");
> + else
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "open() failed");
> + }
> +
> SAFE_UNLINK(TEST_FILE_PATH);
>
> TEST(execveat(fd, "", argv, environ, AT_EMPTY_PATH));
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-20 4:49 [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/execveat03: Fix compiler errors Xiao Yang
2018-08-21 12:02 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2018-08-22 1:17 ` Xiao Yang
2018-08-22 1:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Xiao Yang
2018-08-22 6:49 ` Jan Stancek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1642007852.41615039.1534852963645.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox