From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] Pre-release LTP build
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:07:49 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <166413638.832919.1460552869855.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160412142449.GC2875@rei.suse.cz>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 April, 2016 4:24:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] Pre-release LTP build
>
> Hi!
> > > > +++ b/lib/tst_atomic.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > > > +#if defined(__i386__)
> > > > +unsigned int __sync_add_and_fetch_4(unsigned int *v, unsigned value)
> > > > +{
> > > > + register int val = value;
> > > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ( "lock xadd %1,%0" : "=m" (*v), "=r"
> > > > (val) :
> > > > "1" (val) : "memory");
> > > > + return val + value;
> > > > +}
> > > > +#endif
> > > >
> > > > According to gcc docs it should only make external call to above
> > > > function,
> > > > when it's not provided natively, so it works as fallback.
>
> This does not work with gcc-3.3 where no redirection from
> __sync_add_and_fetch -> __sync_add_and_fetch_4 happens. I would say that
> if we are adding fallback definition it should work with 3.3 as well. So
> I guess we should go with configure check and defining
> sync_add_and_fetch() directly. We can also print nice #error message in
> case that there is no fallback implementation if we decide to go this
> way.
I'll post a series that goes this way shortly. I've based it on kernel
atomic_add_return for architectures that are accessible for me. I tested
it only on RHEL5.6 (gcc 4.1.2), which I think is the oldest active
RHEL release at the moment.
What arches do you care about, that have gcc-3.3?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-13 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-11 17:23 [LTP] Pre-release LTP build Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-12 8:29 ` Jan Stancek
2016-04-12 8:40 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-12 11:57 ` Jan Stancek
2016-04-12 12:23 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-12 13:39 ` Jan Stancek
2016-04-12 14:24 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-13 13:07 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2016-04-13 13:30 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=166413638.832919.1460552869855.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox