From: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
To: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] Skip some dio/fcntl cases on NFS
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:40:52 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1686916829.22340995.1408588852554.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F48DAE.4030704@oracle.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stanislav Kholmanskikh" <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
> To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 7:59:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] Skip some dio/fcntl cases on NFS
>
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for delay.
>
No problem. :)
Thanks for reviewing!
> On 08/12/2014 08:37 AM, Xiong Zhou wrote:
> >
> > According to description of NFS and directIO in open(2), especially
> > "The Linux NFS client places no alignment restrictions on
> > O_DIRECT I/O", ignore "odd count"/"non-aligned" read-write FAILs
> > in diotest4. Some dup code clean up btw.
>
> I think it would be better to split the logic and cleanup parts into
> separate patches, because both parts are not small.
>
Yes, It should be split. So does the change of different files.
>
> >
> > According to nfs(5), NLM supports advisory file locks only. So skip
> > fcntl16 test if NFS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest4.c | 148
> > ++++++++++++++----------------
> > testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c | 8 ++
> > 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest4.c
> > b/testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest4.c
> > index 10281bf..934d5b1 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest4.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest4.c
> > @@ -71,9 +71,11 @@
> >
> > #include "test.h"
> > #include "usctest.h"
> > +#include "tst_fs_type.h"
> >
> > char *TCID = "diotest4"; /* Test program identifier. */
> > int TST_TOTAL = 17; /* Total number of test conditions */
> > +int NO_NFS = 1; /* Test on NFS or not */
> >
> > #ifdef O_DIRECT
> >
> > @@ -171,6 +173,16 @@ void prg_usage()
> > exit(1);
> > }
> >
> > +static void testcheck_end(int ret, int *failed, int *fail_count, char
> > *msg)
> > +{
> > + if (ret != 0) {
> > + *failed = TRUE;
> > + *fail_count++;
> > + tst_resm(TFAIL, msg);
> > + } else
> > + tst_resm(TPASS, msg);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void setup(void);
> > static void cleanup(void);
> > static int fd1 = -1;
> > @@ -206,6 +218,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >
> > setup();
> >
> > + /* On NFS or not */
> > + if (tst_fs_type(cleanup, ".") == TST_NFS_MAGIC)
> > + NO_NFS = 0;
> > +
>
> Maybe put it to setup(). IMHO, it's logically coupled with setup().
>
OK, It does and it meets the 'Unless' part of libltp guideline 3 in doc/style-guide.txt.
> > /* Open file and fill, allocate for buffer */
> > if ((fd = open(filename, O_DIRECT | O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0666)) < 0) {
> > tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "open failed for %s: %s",
> > @@ -251,17 +267,41 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > /* Test-3: Odd count of read and write */
> > offset = 0;
> > count = 1;
> > + l_fail = 0;
> > lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
> > if (write(fd, buf2, 4096) == -1) {
> > tst_resm(TFAIL, "can't write to file %d", ret);
> > }
> > - ret = runtest_f(fd, buf2, offset, count, EINVAL, 3, "odd count");
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Odd count of read and write");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "Odd count of read and write");
> > + if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
> > + if (errno != EINVAL) {
> > + tst_resm(TFAIL, "lseek before read failed: %s",
> > + strerror(errno));
> > + l_fail = TRUE;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + ret = read(fd, buf2, count);
> > + if ((ret >= 0 || errno != EINVAL) && NO_NFS) {
> > + tst_resm(TFAIL, "read allows %s. returns %d: %s",
> > + "odd count", ret, strerror(errno));
> > + l_fail = TRUE;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + if (lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
> > + if (errno != EINVAL) {
> > + tst_resm(TFAIL, "lseek before write failed: %s",
> > + strerror(errno));
> > + l_fail = TRUE;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + ret = write(fd, buf2, count);
> > + if ((ret >= 0 || errno != EINVAL) && NO_NFS) {
> > + tst_resm(TFAIL, "write allows %s.returns %d: %s",
> > + "odd count", ret, strerror(errno));
> > + l_fail = TRUE;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + testcheck_end(l_fail, &failed, &fail_count,
> > + "Odd count of read and write");
>
> You copied code from runtest_f(). I suppose it's easier to skip this
> entire test case on NFS, than skipping only write() and read() failures.
> Like:
>
> offset = 0;
> count = 1;
> lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
> if (write(...)) {
> ...
> }
> if (NO_NFS) {
> ret = runtest_f();
> testcheck_end();
> } else {
> tst_resm(TCONF, "Statement that this test case is not applicable to
> NFS");
> }
> total++;
OK, This is better and more concise.
>
> > total++;
> >
> > /* Test-4: Read beyond the file size */
> > @@ -290,12 +330,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > count = bufsize;
> > newfd = -1;
> > ret = runtest_f(newfd, buf2, offset, count, EBADF, 5, "negative fd");
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Invalid file descriptor");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "Invalid file descriptor");
> > + testcheck_end(ret, &failed, &fail_count, "Invalid file descriptor");
> > total++;
> >
> > /* Test-6: Out of range file descriptor */
> > @@ -306,15 +341,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > failed = TRUE;
> > tst_resm(TFAIL, "Out of range file descriptor");
> > } else {
> > - ret =
> > - runtest_f(newfd, buf2, offset, count, EBADF, 6,
> > + ret = runtest_f(newfd, buf2, offset, count, EBADF, 6,
> > "out of range fd");
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Out of range file descriptor");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "Out of range file descriptor");
> > + testcheck_end(ret, &failed, &fail_count,
> > + "Out of range file descriptor");
> > }
> > close(newfd);
> > total++;
> > @@ -327,12 +357,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > strerror(errno));
> > }
> > ret = runtest_f(fd, buf2, offset, count, EBADF, 7, "closed fd");
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Closed file descriptor");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "Closed file descriptor");
> > + testcheck_end(ret, &failed, &fail_count, "Closed file descriptor");
> > total++;
> >
> > /* Test-9: removed */
> > @@ -345,12 +370,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > tst_resm(TCONF, "Direct I/O on /dev/null is not supported");
> > } else {
> > ret = runtest_s(newfd, buf2, offset, count, 9, "/dev/null");
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "character device read, write");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "character device read, write");
> > + testcheck_end(ret, &failed, &fail_count,
> > + "character device read, write");
> > }
> > close(newfd);
> > total++;
> > @@ -373,12 +394,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > strerror(errno));
> > }
> > ret = runtest_s(fd, buf2, offset, count, 10, "mmapped file");
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "read, write to a mmaped file");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "read, write to a mmaped file");
> > + testcheck_end(ret, &failed, &fail_count,
> > + "read, write to a mmaped file");
> > total++;
> >
> > /* Test-11: read, write to an unmaped file with munmap */
> > @@ -387,12 +404,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > strerror(errno));
> > }
> > ret = runtest_s(fd, buf2, offset, count, 11, "unmapped file");
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "read, write to an unmapped file");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "read, write to an unmapped file");
> > + testcheck_end(ret, &failed, &fail_count,
> > + "read, write to an unmapped file");
> > close(fd);
> > total++;
> >
> > @@ -459,7 +472,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > strerror(errno));
> > l_fail = TRUE;
> > } else {
> > - if ((ret = read(fd, buf2 + 1, count)) != -1) {
> > + if (((ret = read(fd, buf2 + 1, count)) != -1) && NO_NFS) {
> > tst_resm(TFAIL,
> > "allows read nonaligned buf. returns %d: %s",
> > ret, strerror(errno));
> > @@ -471,19 +484,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > strerror(errno));
> > l_fail = TRUE;
> > } else {
> > - if ((ret = write(fd, buf2 + 1, count)) != -1) {
> > + if (((ret = write(fd, buf2 + 1, count)) != -1) && NO_NFS) {
> > tst_resm(TFAIL,
> > "allows write nonaligned buf. returns %d: %s",
> > ret, strerror(errno));
> > l_fail = TRUE;
> > }
> > }
> > - if (l_fail) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "read, write with non-aligned buffer");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "read, write with non-aligned buffer");
> > + testcheck_end(l_fail, &failed, &fail_count,
> > + "read, write with non-aligned buffer");
>
> Could we use runtest_f(EINVAL) here for Test-14 and apply the algorithm
> I described above for Test-3?
>
Of course.
Thanks for reviewing!
Regards,
xzhou
>
> > total++;
> > close(fd);
> >
> > @@ -500,8 +509,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > strerror(errno));
> > l_fail = TRUE;
> > } else {
> > - ret =
> > - read(fd, (char *)((ulong) ADDRESS_OF_MAIN & pagemask),
> > + ret = read(fd, (char *)((ulong) ADDRESS_OF_MAIN & pagemask),
> > count);
> > if (ret >= 0 || errno != EFAULT) {
> > tst_resm(TFAIL,
> > @@ -515,8 +523,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > strerror(errno));
> > l_fail = TRUE;
> > } else {
> > - ret =
> > - write(fd, (char *)((ulong) ADDRESS_OF_MAIN & pagemask),
> > + ret = write(fd, (char *)((ulong) ADDRESS_OF_MAIN & pagemask),
> > count);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > tst_resm(TFAIL,
> > @@ -525,12 +532,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > l_fail = TRUE;
> > }
> > }
> > - if (l_fail) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "read, write buffer in read-only space");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "read, write buffer in read-only space");
> > + testcheck_end(l_fail, &failed, &fail_count,
> > + "read, write buffer in read-only space");
> > close(fd);
> > total++;
> >
> > @@ -545,15 +548,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup,
> > "open(%s, O_DIRECT|O_RDWR) failed", filename);
> > }
> > - ret =
> > - runtest_f(fd, buf1, offset, count, EFAULT, 16,
> > + ret = runtest_f(fd, buf1, offset, count, EFAULT, 16,
> > " nonexistant space");
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "read, write in non-existant space");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "read, write in non-existant space");
> > + testcheck_end(ret, &failed, &fail_count,
> > + "read, write in non-existant space");
> > total++;
> > close(fd);
> >
> > @@ -565,12 +563,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > "open(%s, O_DIRECT|O_RDWR|O_SYNC failed)", filename);
> > }
> > ret = runtest_s(fd, buf2, offset, count, 17, "opened with O_SYNC");
> > - if (ret != 0) {
> > - failed = TRUE;
> > - fail_count++;
> > - tst_resm(TFAIL, "read, write for file with O_SYNC");
> > - } else
> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "read, write for file with O_SYNC");
> > + testcheck_end(ret, &failed, &fail_count,
> > + "read, write for file with O_SYNC");
> > total++;
> > close(fd);
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
> > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
> > index 44b6a80..7dba6ea 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
> > @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> > #include <sys/wait.h>
> >
> > +#include "tst_fs_type.h"
> > +
> > #define SKIPVAL 0x0f00
> > //#define SKIP SKIPVAL, 0, 0L, 0L, IGNORED
> > #define SKIP 0,0,0L,0L,0
> > @@ -412,6 +414,12 @@ void setup(void)
> >
> > tst_tmpdir();
> >
> > + /* On NFS or not */
> > + if (tst_fs_type(cleanup, ".") == TST_NFS_MAGIC) {
> > + tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup, "Cannot test madatory locking "
> > + "on a file located on an NFS filesystem");
> > + }
> > +
> > /* set up temp filename */
> > sprintf(tmpname, "fcntl4.%d", parent);
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-21 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1732727369.18779125.1407818184641.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2014-08-12 4:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] Skip some dio/fcntl cases on NFS Xiong Zhou
2014-08-20 1:23 ` Xiong Zhou
2014-08-20 11:59 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2014-08-21 2:40 ` Xiong Zhou [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1686916829.22340995.1408588852554.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=xzhou@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox