From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] LTP pre-release testing and freeze
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:25:13 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1728203866.1199576.1461839113790.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160420143031.GB4004@rei>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 April, 2016 4:30:31 PM
> Subject: [LTP] LTP pre-release testing and freeze
>
> Hi!
> Are we ready for the git repository freeze and pre-release testing?
>
> Are there any patches that were not reviewed/pushed yet that should be
> part of the next release?
>
> Ideally I would like to proceed with the freeze at the end of this week
> then have at least a week for running the tests and if everything goes
> well the release would be carried on end of April or beginning of May.
> Does that sound reasonable?
Looks good from my side. I ran the usual set we use as smoke test
(syscalls, selection of mem/io/etc.) on
RHEL6.2 through RHEL6.8 (i386, x86_64, ppc64, s390x)
RHEL7.0 through RHEL7.2 (x86_64, ppc64, ppc64le, s390x, aarch64)
and ran mostly into known bugs in kernel / glibc.
Other than known issues, there were couple failures to note:
epoll_wait02
There is a tolerance, but it goes only one way (oversleep).
I occasionally see it waking up a ms earlier and then testcase
reports it as failure. This was new addition, so there are
no historical data for comparison.
personality01
PER_LINUX32 is masked on powerpc as PER_LINUX, so this
always fails.
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls.c:
long ppc64_personality(unsigned long personality)
{
long ret;
if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32
&& personality(personality) == PER_LINUX)
personality = (personality & ~PER_MASK) | PER_LINUX32;
ret = sys_personality(personality);
if (personality(ret) == PER_LINUX32)
ret = (ret & ~PER_MASK) | PER_LINUX;
return ret;
}
Regards,
Jan
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 14:30 [LTP] LTP pre-release testing and freeze Cyril Hrubis
2016-04-28 10:25 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2016-04-28 12:26 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-05-02 9:10 ` Jan Stancek
2016-05-02 9:45 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-05-02 10:06 ` Jan Stancek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1728203866.1199576.1461839113790.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox