From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Stancek Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 01:46:27 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/ioctl09: Add test for BLKRRPART ioctl In-Reply-To: <1690c3ad-a7d4-fa18-db19-343e3e345f8c@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1594016612-7975-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> <150668383.1091545.1594129246387.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1690c3ad-a7d4-fa18-db19-343e3e345f8c@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: <172872545.1186681.1594187187385.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it ----- Original Message ----- > > 20MB feels a bit small, even though tests I ran passed on old and new > > kernels. > > LTP default is 256, to cover various filesystems, but here we don't even > > write anything.. > In actually, ioctl_loop01 test case also uses 10M size and we only cover > ext4 fileystem in here. I don't have objection about changing this size > to 256M. Just reconfirm. If so, we should also modify ioctl_loop01 code. OK, thanks for pointing that out. I wanted to go to 32 or 64, but if 10 worked in ioctl_loop01 until now, then 20 should be fine here.