From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] zram01: Fix on ppc64le
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:24:10 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1788271290.2108729.1486646650050.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170209120245.GD12673@rei.lan>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Thursday, 9 February, 2017 1:02:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] zram01: Fix on ppc64le
>
> Hi!
> > There is still one unsolved problem since the TWARN messages from the
> > tst_device.c will trigger TBROK in tst_test.c since the IPC is not
> > initialized. I'm still unsure how to fix that, maybe we should allow to
> > allocate non-shared structure for the results in the special case that
> > the library code is being reused in shell helpers.
>
> Maybe we should just add an API to redirect tst_brk() and tst_res() so
> that we could use library code in the various non-test utilities.
Or drop that TBROK?
diff --git a/lib/tst_test.c b/lib/tst_test.c
index e78b412cbd9b..52f85c7af891 100644
--- a/lib/tst_test.c
+++ b/lib/tst_test.c
@@ -146,10 +146,8 @@ void tst_reinit(void)
static void update_results(const char *file, unsigned int lineno, int ttype)
{
- if (!results) {
- tst_brk(TBROK,
- "%s: %d: Results IPC not initialized!", file, lineno);
- }
+ if (!results)
+ return;
switch (ttype) {
case TCONF:
There's no way "results" can be NULL when in test:
main
tst_run_tcases
do_setup
setup_ipc
SAFE_MMAP
> Maybe
> we could patch things up so that we could use SAFE_MACROS() in cleanup
> as well...
This should be doable with some flag we set in do_test_cleanup(), to skip
further calls.
Regards,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-09 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-31 13:44 [LTP] [PATCH] [RFC] zram01: Fix on ppc64le Cyril Hrubis
2017-01-31 16:14 ` Jan Stancek
2017-02-01 9:45 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-01 10:59 ` Jan Stancek
2017-02-02 15:22 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-08 11:10 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-09 12:02 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-09 13:24 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2017-02-09 14:00 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-09 14:48 ` Jan Stancek
2017-02-09 14:56 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-08-15 9:23 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-08-15 11:44 ` Jan Stancek
2017-08-15 12:38 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-08-15 12:48 ` Jan Stancek
2017-08-15 12:57 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1788271290.2108729.1486646650050.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox