public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] fanotify06 always failed on RHEL7
       [not found] <671699407.9161653.1421743558663.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
@ 2015-01-20  8:57 ` Li Wang
  2015-01-20  9:29   ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2015-01-20  8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack; +Cc: ltp-list

Hi Jack & all,

fanotify06 always failed on RHEL7-GA as below. When I make some change of the codes flow, Test Pass All. 
Could you take a look at my unsure patch?

<<<test_start>>>
tag=fanotify06 stime=1421726003
cmdline="fanotify06"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
fanotify06    1  TPASS  :  group 0 get event: mask 2 pid=14922 fd=15
fanotify06    2  TPASS  :  group 1 get event: mask 2 pid=14922 fd=15
fanotify06    3  TPASS  :  group 2 get event: mask 2 pid=14922 fd=15
fanotify06    4  TFAIL  :  fanotify06.c:217: group 3 got event
fanotify06    5  TFAIL  :  fanotify06.c:217: group 4 got event
fanotify06    6  TFAIL  :  fanotify06.c:217: group 5 got event
fanotify06    7  TPASS  :  group 6 got no event
fanotify06    8  TPASS  :  group 7 got no event
fanotify06    9  TPASS  :  group 8 got no event

---------
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanot
index 8dcd68a..63519f6 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c
@@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ static void create_fanotify_groups(void)
                                                 "fanotify_init failed");
                                }
                        }
-                       /* Add mount mark for each group */
+                       /* Add mount mark for group with lower priority */
+                       if (p == 0) {
                        ret = fanotify_mark(fd_notify[p][i],
                                            FAN_MARK_ADD | FAN_MARK_MOUNT,
                                            FAN_MODIFY,
@@ -104,9 +105,9 @@ static void create_fanotify_groups(void)
                                         "FAN_MARK_MOUNT, FAN_MODIFY, AT_FDCWD,"
                                         " '.') failed", fd_notify[p][i]);
                        }
+                       continue;
+                       }
                        /* Add ignore mark for groups with higher priority */
-                       if (p == 0)
-                               continue;
                        ret = fanotify_mark(fd_notify[p][i],
                                            FAN_MARK_ADD |
                                            FAN_MARK_IGNORED_MASK |


-- 
Regards, 
Li Wang 
Email: liwang@redhat.com 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] fanotify06 always failed on RHEL7
  2015-01-20  8:57 ` [LTP] fanotify06 always failed on RHEL7 Li Wang
@ 2015-01-20  9:29   ` Jan Kara
  2015-01-20 10:05     ` Li Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-01-20  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Wang; +Cc: ltp-list, jack

On Tue 20-01-15 03:57:29, Li Wang wrote:
> Hi Jack & all,
> 
> fanotify06 always failed on RHEL7-GA as below. When I make some change of the codes flow, Test Pass All. 
> Could you take a look at my unsure patch?
> 
> <<<test_start>>>
> tag=fanotify06 stime=1421726003
> cmdline="fanotify06"
> contacts=""
> analysis=exit
> <<<test_output>>>
> fanotify06    1  TPASS  :  group 0 get event: mask 2 pid=14922 fd=15
> fanotify06    2  TPASS  :  group 1 get event: mask 2 pid=14922 fd=15
> fanotify06    3  TPASS  :  group 2 get event: mask 2 pid=14922 fd=15
> fanotify06    4  TFAIL  :  fanotify06.c:217: group 3 got event
> fanotify06    5  TFAIL  :  fanotify06.c:217: group 4 got event
> fanotify06    6  TFAIL  :  fanotify06.c:217: group 5 got event
> fanotify06    7  TPASS  :  group 6 got no event
> fanotify06    8  TPASS  :  group 7 got no event
> fanotify06    9  TPASS  :  group 8 got no event
  Well, likely the reason is that you don't have commit
8edc6e1688fc8f02c8c1f53a2ec4928cb1055f4d in your kernel. The test is
correct as is.

									Honza
> 
> ---------
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanot
> index 8dcd68a..63519f6 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ static void create_fanotify_groups(void)
>                                                  "fanotify_init failed");
>                                 }
>                         }
> -                       /* Add mount mark for each group */
> +                       /* Add mount mark for group with lower priority */
> +                       if (p == 0) {
>                         ret = fanotify_mark(fd_notify[p][i],
>                                             FAN_MARK_ADD | FAN_MARK_MOUNT,
>                                             FAN_MODIFY,
> @@ -104,9 +105,9 @@ static void create_fanotify_groups(void)
>                                          "FAN_MARK_MOUNT, FAN_MODIFY, AT_FDCWD,"
>                                          " '.') failed", fd_notify[p][i]);
>                         }
> +                       continue;
> +                       }
>                         /* Add ignore mark for groups with higher priority */
> -                       if (p == 0)
> -                               continue;
>                         ret = fanotify_mark(fd_notify[p][i],
>                                             FAN_MARK_ADD |
>                                             FAN_MARK_IGNORED_MASK |
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards, 
> Li Wang 
> Email: liwang@redhat.com 
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] fanotify06 always failed on RHEL7
  2015-01-20  9:29   ` Jan Kara
@ 2015-01-20 10:05     ` Li Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2015-01-20 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kara; +Cc: ltp-list



----- Original Message -----
> On Tue 20-01-15 03:57:29, Li Wang wrote:
> > Hi Jack & all,
> > 
> > fanotify06 always failed on RHEL7-GA as below. When I make some change of
> > the codes flow, Test Pass All.
> > Could you take a look at my unsure patch?
> > 
> > <<<test_start>>>
> > tag=fanotify06 stime=1421726003
> > cmdline="fanotify06"
> > contacts=""
> > analysis=exit
> > <<<test_output>>>
> > fanotify06    1  TPASS  :  group 0 get event: mask 2 pid=14922 fd=15
> > fanotify06    2  TPASS  :  group 1 get event: mask 2 pid=14922 fd=15
> > fanotify06    3  TPASS  :  group 2 get event: mask 2 pid=14922 fd=15
> > fanotify06    4  TFAIL  :  fanotify06.c:217: group 3 got event
> > fanotify06    5  TFAIL  :  fanotify06.c:217: group 4 got event
> > fanotify06    6  TFAIL  :  fanotify06.c:217: group 5 got event
> > fanotify06    7  TPASS  :  group 6 got no event
> > fanotify06    8  TPASS  :  group 7 got no event
> > fanotify06    9  TPASS  :  group 8 got no event
>   Well, likely the reason is that you don't have commit
> 8edc6e1688fc8f02c8c1f53a2ec4928cb1055f4d in your kernel. The test is
> correct as is.

Great! Thank you for your response promptly.

Li Wang

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-20 10:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <671699407.9161653.1421743558663.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2015-01-20  8:57 ` [LTP] fanotify06 always failed on RHEL7 Li Wang
2015-01-20  9:29   ` Jan Kara
2015-01-20 10:05     ` Li Wang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox