From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sf.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] networking/stress/tcp: make sure we will kill the test case after timeout
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:56:46 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1875908008.1793486.1372676206673.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPwn2JQ+ri=T9Fs6JWdF+v_8x9Nk5wPqo5aTrzb1A9ERr2DgEQ@mail.gmail.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hangbin Liu" <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: "ltp-list" <ltp-list@lists.sf.net>
> Sent: Monday, 1 July, 2013 10:31:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] networking/stress/tcp: make sure we will kill the test case after timeout
>
> Hi Jan,
> The problem is the connection won't fail, but only need too much
> time. For example:
I see, checking after each X connection seems reasonable.
I'm not very familiar with this test, so it's up to you to come up with some number.
Regards,
Jan
> On a guest: on cpu process, 2G memory
> # for i in `seq 4000`; do ./ns-tcpclient -b -f 4 -S 10.66.87.216 -p
> 9999; echo "The $i connection : `date`"; done
> The 1 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:03:05 EDT 2013
> The 2 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:03:05 EDT 2013
> The 3 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:03:05 EDT 2013
> The 4 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:03:06 EDT 2013
> <snip>
> The 19 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:04:46 EDT 2013
> <snip>
> The 30 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:06:34 EDT 2013
> The 31 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:07:52 EDT 2013
> <snip>
> The 45 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:10:11 EDT 2013
> <snip>
> The 50 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:12:05 EDT 2013
>
> You can saw we took 9 minutes to set up 50 tcp connections.
>
> But on a powerful physical machine,
> The 1 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:21:08 EDT 2013
> The 2 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:21:08 EDT 2013
> <snip>
> The 499 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:24:35 EDT 2013
> The 500 connection : Mon Jul 1 04:24:35 EDT 2013
>
> It only use 3 minutest to set up 500 connections.
>
> So we can't just continue on success, but should check the time after
> some connections.
>
> Thanks and Best regards
> Hangbin Liu
>
> 2013/6/28 Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Hangbin Liu" <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> >> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, 28 June, 2013 11:30:02 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] networking/stress/tcp: make sure we will kill
> >> the test case after timeout
> >>
> >
> > Hangbin,
> >
> > just fyi, your replies are not going to list.
> >
> >> Opps, My mistake. Didn't find there is a sleep 1...
> >>
> >> I will send another patch for this issue. How about check
> >> $connection_num every 100 times. like
> >
> > I'd go with new variable to count each attempt, not just successful ones.
> >
> > Or something like this (on top your patch):
> > Skip the sleep and continue on success, if we hit issue sleep and retry as
> > watchdog allows.
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/testcases/network/stress/tcp/multi-sameport/tcp4-multi-sameport01
> > b/testcases/network/stress/tcp/multi-sameport/tcp4-multi-sameport01
> > index 206a0d1..649c60b 100644
> > --- a/testcases/network/stress/tcp/multi-sameport/tcp4-multi-sameport01
> > +++ b/testcases/network/stress/tcp/multi-sameport/tcp4-multi-sameport01
> > @@ -351,9 +351,10 @@ while true ; do
> > fi
> > # Failed to start a client
> > tst_resm TINFO "$connection_num seems the maximum
> > number of the client"
> > - break
> > + else
> > + connection_num=`expr $connection_num + 1`
> > + continue;
> > fi
> > - connection_num=`expr $connection_num + 1`
> > fi
> >
> > current_epoc=`date +%s`
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jan
> >
> >>
> >> --- a/testcases/network/stress/tcp/multi-sameport/tcp4-multi-sameport01
> >> +++ b/testcases/network/stress/tcp/multi-sameport/tcp4-multi-sameport01
> >> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ connection_num=0
> >> start_epoc=`date +%s`
> >> while true ; do
> >> # Making connections
> >> - if [ $connection_num -lt $CONNECTION_TOTAL ]; then
> >> + while [ $connection_num -lt $CONNECTION_TOTAL ]; do
> >> # Run a client
> >> ret=`$LTP_RSH $RHOST
> >> ${LTPROOT}/testcases/bin/ns-tcpclient -b -f $IP_VER -S $lhost_addr -p
> >> $server_port' ; ec
> >> if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then
> >> @@ -354,7 +354,12 @@ while true ; do
> >> break
> >> fi
> >> connection_num=`expr $connection_num + 1`
> >> - fi
> >> +
> >> + # check timeout every 100 times
> >> + if [ $(($connection_num % 100)) -eq 0 ];then
> >> + break
> >> + fi
> >> + done
> >>
> >> current_epoc=`date +%s`
> >> elapse_epoc=`expr $current_epoc - $start_epoc`
> >>
> >> 2013/6/28 Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> From: "Hangbin Liu" <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> >> >> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> >> >> Sent: Friday, 28 June, 2013 8:36:05 AM
> >> >> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] networking/stress/tcp: make sure we will
> >> >> kill
> >> >> the test case after timeout
> >> >>
> >> >> No, we can set up $CONNECTION_TOTAL connections as soon as possible,
> >> >> and
> >> >> also
> >> >> transmit tcp data at the same time.
> >> >
> >> > Where does this happen?
> >> >
> >> > I'm looking at the while loop, and I see it creates 1 connection each
> >> > iteration, then it sleeps for 1 second.
> >> >
> >> > Am I missing something here?
> >> >
> >> > while true ; do
> >> > # Making connections
> >> > if [ $connection_num -lt $CONNECTION_TOTAL ]; then
> >> > # make new connection
> >> > ...
> >> > connection_num=`expr $connection_num + 1`
> >> > fi
> >> >
> >> > # check time
> >> > ...
> >> > sleep 1
> >> > done
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Jan
> >>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-01 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 7:48 [LTP] [PATCH] networking/stress/tcp: make sure we will kill the test case after timeout Hangbin Liu
2013-06-27 16:25 ` Jan Stancek
[not found] ` <CAPwn2JTuF3EVb8_XoWkFk=qZc61FhNHenNDmdR7b6xrZFf9x1g@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-28 7:13 ` Jan Stancek
[not found] ` <CAPwn2JRYRWDEvn090NdtM1K178R=yQSasmBX3ZoKymVtcRWPXw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-28 11:06 ` Jan Stancek
2013-07-01 8:31 ` Hangbin Liu
2013-07-01 10:56 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2013-07-04 1:03 ` Hangbin Liu
2013-07-01 12:56 ` KUMAR, BHUSHAN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1875908008.1793486.1372676206673.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sf.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox