From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: LTP List <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [LTP] failing syscall testcases with kernel 3.5.0
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:30:36 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1893607568.8224293.1344000636463.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1830812880.8215441.1343999990387.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Hi,
These are failures I currently see with kernel 3.5.0 (likely same in 3.6-rc1):
sockioctl01 1 TPASS : bad file descriptor successful
sockioctl01 2 TFAIL : not a socket ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 25 (expected 22)
sockioctl01 3 TPASS : invalid option buffer successful
sockioctl01 4 TPASS : ATMARK on UDP successful
sockioctl01 5 TPASS : SIOCGIFCONF successful
sockioctl01 6 TPASS : SIOCGIFFLAGS successful
sockioctl01 7 TPASS : SIOCGIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
sockioctl01 8 TPASS : SIOCSIFFLAGS with invalid ifr successful
^^ posted patch today
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case00) START
mbind01 1 TPASS : (case00) END
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case01) START
mbind01 2 TPASS : (case01) END
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case02) START
mbind01 3 TPASS : (case02) END
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case03) START
mbind01 4 TFAIL : (case03) END: errno=???(0): Success
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case04) START
mbind01 5 TPASS : (case04) END
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case05) START
mbind01 6 TFAIL : (case05) END: errno=???(0): Success
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case06) START
mbind01 7 TFAIL : (case06) END: errno=???(0): Success
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case07) START
mbind01 8 TFAIL : (case07) END: errno=???(0): Success
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case08) START
mbind01 9 TPASS : (case08) END
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case09) START
mbind01 10 TPASS : (case09) END
mbind01 0 TINFO : (case10) START
mbind01 11 TPASS : (case10) END
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case00) START
get_mempolicy01 1 TPASS : (case00) END
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case01) START
get_mempolicy01 2 TPASS : (case01) END
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case02) START
get_mempolicy01 3 TPASS : (case02) END
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case03) START
get_mempolicy01 4 TPASS : (case03) END
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case04) START
get_mempolicy01 5 TPASS : (case04) END
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case05) START
get_mempolicy01 6 TPASS : (case05) END
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case06) START
get_mempolicy01 7 TFAIL : (case06) END: errno=???(0): Success
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case07) START
get_mempolicy01 8 TFAIL : (case07) END: errno=???(0): Success
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case08) START
get_mempolicy01 9 TFAIL : (case08) END: errno=???(0): Success
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case09) START
get_mempolicy01 10 TFAIL : (case09) END: errno=???(0): Success
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case10) START
get_mempolicy01 11 TPASS : (case10) END
get_mempolicy01 0 TINFO : (case11) START
get_mempolicy01 12 TPASS : (case11) END
move_pages01 1 TFAIL : page 0 on node 1, expected on node 0
mbind01, get_mempolicy01 and move_pages01 are all related to mbind().
It appears that starting with following commit mbind has no effect.
--------------------------------------------------------------
commit 05f144a0d5c2207a0349348127f996e104ad7404
Author: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Wed May 23 12:48:13 2012 +0100
mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma->vm_policy linkages
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bug 845268 - mbind reports success, but has no effect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845268
Regards,
Jan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-03 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <1830812880.8215441.1343999990387.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1893607568.8224293.1344000636463.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox