From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 3/3] diotest5.c: replaced iovec
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 04:53:13 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1912499711.38973678.1446195193937.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446137758-27267-3-git-send-email-chnyda@suse.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cedric Hnyda" <chnyda@suse.com>
> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Thursday, 29 October, 2015 5:55:58 PM
> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 3/3] diotest5.c: replaced iovec
>
> Replaced iovec pointers by normal buffers.
> iovec were passed instead of expected buffers.
What is the problem with iovecs here?
Isn't readv/writev meant to be used in this test?
* DESCRIPTION
* The programs test buffered and direct IO with vector arrays using
* readv() and writev() calls.
Regards,
Jan
>
> Signed-off-by: Cedric Hnyda <chnyda@suse.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest5.c | 54
> +++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest5.c
> b/testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest5.c
> index 0c10742..e5946bd 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest5.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/io/direct_io/diotest5.c
> @@ -84,49 +84,30 @@ static void prg_usage(void);
> static int runtest(int fd_r, int fd_w, int iter, off64_t offset)
> {
> int i, bufsize = BUFSIZE;
> - struct iovec *iov1, *iov2, *iovp;
>
> /* Allocate for buffers and data pointers */
> - iov1 = (struct iovec *) valloc(sizeof(struct iovec) * nvector);
> - if (iov1 == NULL) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "valloc() buf1 failed: %s", strerror(errno));
> - return (-1);
> - }
> + char *buf1, *buf2;
>
> - iov2 = (struct iovec *) valloc(sizeof(struct iovec) * nvector);
> - if (iov2 == NULL) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "valloc buf2 failed: %s", strerror(errno));
> - return (-1);
> - }
> - for (i = 0, iovp = iov1; i < nvector; iovp++, i++) {
> - iovp->iov_base = valloc(bufsize);
> - if (iovp->iov_base == NULL) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "valloc for iovp->iov_base: %s",
> - strerror(errno));
> - return (-1);
> - }
> - iovp->iov_len = bufsize;
> - }
> - for (i = 0, iovp = iov2; i < nvector; iovp++, i++) {
> - iovp->iov_base = valloc(bufsize);
> - if (iovp->iov_base == NULL) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "valloc, iov2 for iovp->iov_base: %s",
> - strerror(errno));
> - return (-1);
> - }
> - iovp->iov_len = bufsize;
> + buf1 = valloc(bufsize);
> + buf2 = valloc(bufsize);
> +
> + if (!buf1 || !buf2) {
> + tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "valloc() failed");
> + free(buf1);
> + free(buf2);
> + return -1;
> }
>
> /* Test */
> for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
> - vfillbuf(iov1, nvector, i);
> - vfillbuf(iov2, nvector, i + 1);
> + fillbuf(buf1, bufsize, i);
> + fillbuf(buf2, bufsize, i + 1);
> if (lseek(fd_w, offset, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
> tst_resm(TFAIL, "lseek before writev failed: %s",
> strerror(errno));
> return (-1);
> }
> - if (writev(fd_w, iov1, nvector) < 0) {
> + if (write(fd_w, buf1, bufsize) < 0) {
> tst_resm(TFAIL, "writev failed: %s", strerror(errno));
> return (-1);
> }
> @@ -135,23 +116,16 @@ static int runtest(int fd_r, int fd_w, int iter,
> off64_t offset)
> strerror(errno));
> return (-1);
> }
> - if (readv(fd_r, iov2, nvector) < 0) {
> + if (read(fd_r, buf2, bufsize) < 0) {
> tst_resm(TFAIL, "readv failed: %s", strerror(errno));
> return (-1);
> }
> - if (vbufcmp(iov1, iov2, nvector) != 0) {
> + if (bufcmp(buf1, buf2, bufsize) != 0) {
> tst_resm(TFAIL, "readv/writev comparision failed");
> return (-1);
> }
> }
>
> - /* Cleanup */
> - for (i = 0, iovp = iov1; i < nvector; iovp++, i++)
> - free(iovp->iov_base);
> - for (i = 0, iovp = iov2; i < nvector; iovp++, i++)
> - free(iovp->iov_base);
> - free(iov1);
> - free(iov2);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-30 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-29 16:55 [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] diotest: cleanup & fix Cedric Hnyda
2015-10-29 16:55 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] diotest4.c: Fixed filesystem Cedric Hnyda
2015-10-29 16:55 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/3] diotest5.c: replaced iovec Cedric Hnyda
2015-10-30 8:53 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2015-10-30 9:17 ` Cedric Hnyda
2015-11-04 12:41 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] diotest: cleanup & fix Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1912499711.38973678.1446195193937.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox