public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC] [PATCH] move_pages12: Allocate and free hugepages prior	the test
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 08:50:49 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1977457874.10364325.1494507049706.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170511122636.GA27575@rei.lan>



----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> > > Well that is a few forks away after the failure, if the race window is
> > > small enough we will never see the real value but maybe doing open() and
> > > read() directly would show us different values.
> > 
> > For free/reserved, sure. But is the number of reserved huge pages on
> > each node going to change over time?
> 
> Of course I was speaking about the number of currently free huge pages.
> The pool limit will not change unless something from userspace writes to
> the sysfs file...
> 
> > ---
> > 
> > I was running with 20+20 huge pages over night and it hasn't failed
> > single time. So I'm thinking we allocate 3+3 or 4+4 to avoid any
> > issues related to lazy/deffered updates.
> 
> But we have to lift the per node limits as well, right?

Sorry, what I meant by 'allocate' was configuring per node limits.
I was using your patch as-is, with 2 huge pages allocated/touched
on each node. 

> 
> So what about lifting the per node limit to something as 20 and then try
> to allocate 4 hugepages on each node prior the test?

per node limit 8 and allocate 4 hugepages on each? What worries
me are architectures, where default huge page is very large
(e.g. 512M on aarch64).

Regards,
Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-11 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-09 14:04 [LTP] [RFC] [PATCH] move_pages12: Allocate and free hugepages prior the test Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-10  8:56 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-10 12:21   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-10 13:01     ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-10 13:49   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-10 14:14     ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-10 15:08       ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-11  6:40         ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-11 12:26           ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-11 12:50             ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2017-05-16  9:30               ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1977457874.10364325.1494507049706.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox