* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
[not found] ` <1237385013.5381.58.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
@ 2009-06-23 14:48 ` Subrata Modak
2009-06-23 15:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Subrata Modak @ 2009-06-23 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Serge E. Hallyn
Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin,
Serge Hallyn, sukadev
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:33 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Thanks Serge.
>
> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:39 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > > Serge,
> > >
> > > Did i talk to you regarding these tests in our OLS 2008 meeting ? I do
> > > not remember exactly, but, when i saw this posting, i thought may be
> > > there was some conversation.
> >
> > I'm not sure. However no patches are in -mm or linux-next yet.
> >
> > I'm not yet certain what the test methodology will be. Some for
> > instance feel that the best way to test c/r is to just run ltp
> > inside a container and continuously c/r it. Of course, that
> > isn't very useful when c/r support is not yet sufficient to
> > accomplish that. So at the moment we do have sets of programs
> > specifically written to be checkpointable.
> >
> > For instance I have a program and script which continuously
> > runs, updates state, writes to a file, checkpoints, kills,
> > and restarts. That sort of thing should make a nice testcase.
> > Oren maintains a git tree with checkpointable programs at
> > git://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/user-cr.git .
> >
> > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll
> > whip up some testcases based on existing code.
Serge,
Do we have this in 2.6.30 ?
Regards--
Subrata
>
> We would wait till it hits at least the -mm, from where you can start
> pushing some 2/3 tests.
>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> >
> > -serge
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
> powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
> easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
> software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
> Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
2009-06-23 14:48 ` [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Subrata Modak
@ 2009-06-23 15:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-06-25 9:10 ` Subrata Modak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2009-06-23 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Subrata Modak
Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin,
Serge Hallyn, sukadev
Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:33 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Thanks Serge.
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:39 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > > > Serge,
> > > >
> > > > Did i talk to you regarding these tests in our OLS 2008 meeting ? I do
> > > > not remember exactly, but, when i saw this posting, i thought may be
> > > > there was some conversation.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure. However no patches are in -mm or linux-next yet.
> > >
> > > I'm not yet certain what the test methodology will be. Some for
> > > instance feel that the best way to test c/r is to just run ltp
> > > inside a container and continuously c/r it. Of course, that
> > > isn't very useful when c/r support is not yet sufficient to
> > > accomplish that. So at the moment we do have sets of programs
> > > specifically written to be checkpointable.
> > >
> > > For instance I have a program and script which continuously
> > > runs, updates state, writes to a file, checkpoints, kills,
> > > and restarts. That sort of thing should make a nice testcase.
> > > Oren maintains a git tree with checkpointable programs at
> > > git://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/user-cr.git .
> > >
> > > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll
> > > whip up some testcases based on existing code.
>
> Serge,
>
> Do we have this in 2.6.30 ?
Let me check!
Heh, just kidding. Nope.
-serge
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
2009-06-23 15:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
@ 2009-06-25 9:10 ` Subrata Modak
2009-09-13 13:16 ` Subrata Modak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Subrata Modak @ 2009-06-25 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Serge E. Hallyn
Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin,
Serge Hallyn, sukadev
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:02 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:33 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > Thanks Serge.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:39 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > > > > Serge,
> > > > >
> > > > > Did i talk to you regarding these tests in our OLS 2008 meeting ? I do
> > > > > not remember exactly, but, when i saw this posting, i thought may be
> > > > > there was some conversation.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure. However no patches are in -mm or linux-next yet.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not yet certain what the test methodology will be. Some for
> > > > instance feel that the best way to test c/r is to just run ltp
> > > > inside a container and continuously c/r it. Of course, that
> > > > isn't very useful when c/r support is not yet sufficient to
> > > > accomplish that. So at the moment we do have sets of programs
> > > > specifically written to be checkpointable.
> > > >
> > > > For instance I have a program and script which continuously
> > > > runs, updates state, writes to a file, checkpoints, kills,
> > > > and restarts. That sort of thing should make a nice testcase.
> > > > Oren maintains a git tree with checkpointable programs at
> > > > git://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/user-cr.git .
> > > >
> > > > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll
> > > > whip up some testcases based on existing code.
> >
> > Serge,
> >
> > Do we have this in 2.6.30 ?
>
> Let me check!
>
> Heh, just kidding. Nope.
So, i can expect LTP-mm patches from you in future ;-)
Regards--
Subrata
>
> -serge
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
2009-06-25 9:10 ` Subrata Modak
@ 2009-09-13 13:16 ` Subrata Modak
2009-09-13 20:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Subrata Modak @ 2009-09-13 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Serge E. Hallyn
Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin,
Serge Hallyn, sukadev
Serge,
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 14:40 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:02 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:33 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > > Thanks Serge.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:39 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > > > > > Serge,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did i talk to you regarding these tests in our OLS 2008 meeting ? I do
> > > > > > not remember exactly, but, when i saw this posting, i thought may be
> > > > > > there was some conversation.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure. However no patches are in -mm or linux-next yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not yet certain what the test methodology will be. Some for
> > > > > instance feel that the best way to test c/r is to just run ltp
> > > > > inside a container and continuously c/r it. Of course, that
> > > > > isn't very useful when c/r support is not yet sufficient to
> > > > > accomplish that. So at the moment we do have sets of programs
> > > > > specifically written to be checkpointable.
> > > > >
> > > > > For instance I have a program and script which continuously
> > > > > runs, updates state, writes to a file, checkpoints, kills,
> > > > > and restarts. That sort of thing should make a nice testcase.
> > > > > Oren maintains a git tree with checkpointable programs at
> > > > > git://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/user-cr.git .
> > > > >
> > > > > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll
> > > > > whip up some testcases based on existing code.
Any good news for LTP here ?
Regards--
Subrata
> > >
> > > Serge,
> > >
> > > Do we have this in 2.6.30 ?
> >
> > Let me check!
> >
> > Heh, just kidding. Nope.
>
> So, i can expect LTP-mm patches from you in future ;-)
>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> >
> > -serge
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
2009-09-13 13:16 ` Subrata Modak
@ 2009-09-13 20:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2009-09-13 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Subrata Modak
Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin,
Serge Hallyn, sukadev
Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> Serge,
>
> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 14:40 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > > > > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll
> > > > > > whip up some testcases based on existing code.
>
> Any good news for LTP here ?
Fraid not
-serge
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-13 20:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1233076092-8660-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
[not found] ` <bb33bcf20903160526v56f16a82m9192770e228016b1@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1237365510.5381.34.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20090318133943.GA22636@us.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1237385013.5381.58.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
2009-06-23 14:48 ` [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Subrata Modak
2009-06-23 15:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-06-25 9:10 ` Subrata Modak
2009-09-13 13:16 ` Subrata Modak
2009-09-13 20:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox