* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart [not found] ` <1237385013.5381.58.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> @ 2009-06-23 14:48 ` Subrata Modak 2009-06-23 15:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Subrata Modak @ 2009-06-23 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Serge E. Hallyn Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin, Serge Hallyn, sukadev On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:33 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > Thanks Serge. > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:39 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > > > Serge, > > > > > > Did i talk to you regarding these tests in our OLS 2008 meeting ? I do > > > not remember exactly, but, when i saw this posting, i thought may be > > > there was some conversation. > > > > I'm not sure. However no patches are in -mm or linux-next yet. > > > > I'm not yet certain what the test methodology will be. Some for > > instance feel that the best way to test c/r is to just run ltp > > inside a container and continuously c/r it. Of course, that > > isn't very useful when c/r support is not yet sufficient to > > accomplish that. So at the moment we do have sets of programs > > specifically written to be checkpointable. > > > > For instance I have a program and script which continuously > > runs, updates state, writes to a file, checkpoints, kills, > > and restarts. That sort of thing should make a nice testcase. > > Oren maintains a git tree with checkpointable programs at > > git://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/user-cr.git . > > > > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll > > whip up some testcases based on existing code. Serge, Do we have this in 2.6.30 ? Regards-- Subrata > > We would wait till it hits at least the -mm, from where you can start > pushing some 2/3 tests. > > Regards-- > Subrata > > > > > -serge > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart 2009-06-23 14:48 ` [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Subrata Modak @ 2009-06-23 15:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn 2009-06-25 9:10 ` Subrata Modak 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2009-06-23 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Subrata Modak Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin, Serge Hallyn, sukadev Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:33 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > Thanks Serge. > > > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:39 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > > > > Serge, > > > > > > > > Did i talk to you regarding these tests in our OLS 2008 meeting ? I do > > > > not remember exactly, but, when i saw this posting, i thought may be > > > > there was some conversation. > > > > > > I'm not sure. However no patches are in -mm or linux-next yet. > > > > > > I'm not yet certain what the test methodology will be. Some for > > > instance feel that the best way to test c/r is to just run ltp > > > inside a container and continuously c/r it. Of course, that > > > isn't very useful when c/r support is not yet sufficient to > > > accomplish that. So at the moment we do have sets of programs > > > specifically written to be checkpointable. > > > > > > For instance I have a program and script which continuously > > > runs, updates state, writes to a file, checkpoints, kills, > > > and restarts. That sort of thing should make a nice testcase. > > > Oren maintains a git tree with checkpointable programs at > > > git://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/user-cr.git . > > > > > > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll > > > whip up some testcases based on existing code. > > Serge, > > Do we have this in 2.6.30 ? Let me check! Heh, just kidding. Nope. -serge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart 2009-06-23 15:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn @ 2009-06-25 9:10 ` Subrata Modak 2009-09-13 13:16 ` Subrata Modak 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Subrata Modak @ 2009-06-25 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Serge E. Hallyn Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin, Serge Hallyn, sukadev On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:02 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:33 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > Thanks Serge. > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:39 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > > > > > Serge, > > > > > > > > > > Did i talk to you regarding these tests in our OLS 2008 meeting ? I do > > > > > not remember exactly, but, when i saw this posting, i thought may be > > > > > there was some conversation. > > > > > > > > I'm not sure. However no patches are in -mm or linux-next yet. > > > > > > > > I'm not yet certain what the test methodology will be. Some for > > > > instance feel that the best way to test c/r is to just run ltp > > > > inside a container and continuously c/r it. Of course, that > > > > isn't very useful when c/r support is not yet sufficient to > > > > accomplish that. So at the moment we do have sets of programs > > > > specifically written to be checkpointable. > > > > > > > > For instance I have a program and script which continuously > > > > runs, updates state, writes to a file, checkpoints, kills, > > > > and restarts. That sort of thing should make a nice testcase. > > > > Oren maintains a git tree with checkpointable programs at > > > > git://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/user-cr.git . > > > > > > > > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll > > > > whip up some testcases based on existing code. > > > > Serge, > > > > Do we have this in 2.6.30 ? > > Let me check! > > Heh, just kidding. Nope. So, i can expect LTP-mm patches from you in future ;-) Regards-- Subrata > > -serge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart 2009-06-25 9:10 ` Subrata Modak @ 2009-09-13 13:16 ` Subrata Modak 2009-09-13 20:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Subrata Modak @ 2009-09-13 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Serge E. Hallyn Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin, Serge Hallyn, sukadev Serge, On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 14:40 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:02 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:33 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > > Thanks Serge. > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:39 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > > > > > > Serge, > > > > > > > > > > > > Did i talk to you regarding these tests in our OLS 2008 meeting ? I do > > > > > > not remember exactly, but, when i saw this posting, i thought may be > > > > > > there was some conversation. > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure. However no patches are in -mm or linux-next yet. > > > > > > > > > > I'm not yet certain what the test methodology will be. Some for > > > > > instance feel that the best way to test c/r is to just run ltp > > > > > inside a container and continuously c/r it. Of course, that > > > > > isn't very useful when c/r support is not yet sufficient to > > > > > accomplish that. So at the moment we do have sets of programs > > > > > specifically written to be checkpointable. > > > > > > > > > > For instance I have a program and script which continuously > > > > > runs, updates state, writes to a file, checkpoints, kills, > > > > > and restarts. That sort of thing should make a nice testcase. > > > > > Oren maintains a git tree with checkpointable programs at > > > > > git://git.ncl.cs.columbia.edu/pub/git/user-cr.git . > > > > > > > > > > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll > > > > > whip up some testcases based on existing code. Any good news for LTP here ? Regards-- Subrata > > > > > > Serge, > > > > > > Do we have this in 2.6.30 ? > > > > Let me check! > > > > Heh, just kidding. Nope. > > So, i can expect LTP-mm patches from you in future ;-) > > Regards-- > Subrata > > > > > -serge > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart 2009-09-13 13:16 ` Subrata Modak @ 2009-09-13 20:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2009-09-13 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Subrata Modak Cc: ltp-list, Oren Laadan, Alexander Viro, matthltc, H. Peter Anvin, Serge Hallyn, sukadev Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > Serge, > > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 14:40 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > > > > So definately let's talk again after patches hit mainline. I'll > > > > > > whip up some testcases based on existing code. > > Any good news for LTP here ? Fraid not -serge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-13 20:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1233076092-8660-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
[not found] ` <bb33bcf20903160526v56f16a82m9192770e228016b1@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1237365510.5381.34.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20090318133943.GA22636@us.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1237385013.5381.58.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
2009-06-23 14:48 ` [LTP] [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Subrata Modak
2009-06-23 15:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-06-25 9:10 ` Subrata Modak
2009-09-13 13:16 ` Subrata Modak
2009-09-13 20:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox