Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] say FAIL not PASS when we failed

["Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>]

Quoting Garrett Cooper (yanegomi@gmail.com):
> Ok, so before I commit I just want to make sure that this makes sense with you:
> 
> The differences are:
> 1. The id -?r?u use.

Either one can be fooled, neither should be...

> 2. The while [ ! ... -a ... ] vs until [ ... -o ... ] logic (is more
> clear in my mind because it better describes the desired end-state)
> 3. Removing the which calls (because which doesn't exist on busybox
> from what I've heard) and replacing them with non-absolute commands
> (because it's the same thing...).

All look fine to me.

thanks,
-serge

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list