From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.122] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmmA5-00016i-Hl for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:50:41 +0000 Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.158]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1NmmA4-0003Qr-BD for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:50:41 +0000 Received: from d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.226]) by e37.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o23An6sG013593 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 03:49:06 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o23AoV52055326 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 03:50:31 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o23AoULJ002230 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 03:50:31 -0700 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:20:28 +0530 From: Rishikesh K Rajak Message-ID: <20100303105028.GC23601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <4B8E3C08.2080901@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B8E3C08.2080901@in.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Sachin Sant Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball > from Feb. Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog. Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from : LTP-20100228 . Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But it will be always available with master branch. Thanks Rishi > > The Version file still contains 20100131. > > :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131 > :/home/sachin/work # > > Should this be 20100228 ? > -- Thanks & Regards Rishi LTP Maintainer IBM, LTC, Bangalore Please join IRC #ltp @ irc.freenode.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list