* [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 @ 2010-03-03 10:38 Sachin Sant 2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sachin Sant @ 2010-03-03 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ltp-list Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball from Feb. The Version file still contains 20100131. :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131 :/home/sachin/work # Should this be 20100228 ? Thanks -Sachin -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 2010-03-03 10:38 [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 Sachin Sant @ 2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak 2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-03-03 15:20 ` Sachin Sant 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Rishikesh K Rajak @ 2010-03-03 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sachin Sant; +Cc: ltp-list On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball > from Feb. Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog. Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from : LTP-20100228 . Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But it will be always available with master branch. Thanks Rishi > > The Version file still contains 20100131. > > :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131 > :/home/sachin/work # > > Should this be 20100228 ? > -- Thanks & Regards Rishi LTP Maintainer IBM, LTC, Bangalore Please join IRC #ltp @ irc.freenode.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak @ 2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-03-03 13:57 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-03-03 15:20 ` Sachin Sant 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-03-03 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sachin Sant, ltp-list, yanegomi On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: >> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball >> from Feb. > > Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file > once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog. > > Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from : > LTP-20100228 . > > Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But > it will be always available with master branch. > > Thanks > Rishi >> >> The Version file still contains 20100131. >> >> :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131 >> :/home/sachin/work # >> >> Should this be 20100228 ? Uh, ChangeLog wasn't updated for last month's commits like Subrata normally does... HTH, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper @ 2010-03-03 13:57 ` Garrett Cooper 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-03-03 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sachin Sant, ltp-list, yanegomi On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak > <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: >>> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball >>> from Feb. >> >> Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file >> once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog. >> >> Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from : >> LTP-20100228 . >> >> Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But >> it will be always available with master branch. >> >> Thanks >> Rishi >>> >>> The Version file still contains 20100131. >>> >>> :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131 >>> :/home/sachin/work # >>> >>> Should this be 20100228 ? > > Uh, ChangeLog wasn't updated for last month's commits like Subrata > normally does... It was -- I was looking at the wrong branch. Rishi, Could you please look at scripts/git2changelog.sh for next month? Thanks, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak 2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper @ 2010-03-03 15:20 ` Sachin Sant 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sachin Sant @ 2010-03-03 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ltp-list Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > >> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball >> from Feb. >> > > Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file > once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog. > > Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from : > LTP-20100228 . > > Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But > it will be always available with master branch. > Ah thanks for the explanation. I took a fresh copy of Feb LTP and the version did show 20100228. Thanks -Sachin > Thanks > Rishi > >> The Version file still contains 20100131. >> >> :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131 >> :/home/sachin/work # >> >> Should this be 20100228 ? >> >> -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-03 15:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-03-03 10:38 [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 Sachin Sant 2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak 2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-03-03 13:57 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-03-03 15:20 ` Sachin Sant
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox