public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rishikesh K Rajak <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Caspar ZHANG <czhang@redhat.com>
Cc: LTP Mailing List <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Fix MSGCTL10() to avoid un-necessary cluttering of whole system with all PIDs
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:08:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100420103825.GA4118@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1706047941.560391271757613100.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:00:13AM -0400, Caspar ZHANG wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- "Subrata Modak" <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > msgctl10() un-necessarily eats up all the PIDs of the system leading
> > to
> > system becoming un-responsive. The changed no.s would better do the
> > job.
> 
> Hi, I see this patch is not included in ltp-full-20100331, will it be 
> accepted in the future? 

Thanks for testing this patch. can you put your Acked-By / Tested-By ?

After that it will be included in master branch immediately.

-Rishi
> 
> I tested msgctl10 testcase on RHEL5(2.6.18) and RHEL6(>2.6.31),
> Since /proc/sys/kernel/msgmni has increased from 10 (RHEL5) to 
> thousands (RHEL6), the testing time will be several hours long.
> Applied this patch, the testing time can be lowed down to minutes.
> 
> Thanks,
> Caspar
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak<subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > ---
> > ltp-full-20100131/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgctl/msgctl10.c.orig
> > 2010-02-19 17:59:23.000000000 +0530
> > +++ ltp-full-20100131/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgctl/msgctl10.c
> > 2010-02-19 18:01:13.000000000 +0530
> > @@ -65,12 +65,8 @@ extern int Tst_count;		/* Test Case coun
> >  
> >  int exp_enos[] = { 0 };		/* List must end with 0 */
> >  
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_COLDFIRE
> > -#define MAXNPROCS	1000000	/* This value is set to an arbitrary high
> > limit. */
> > -#else
> > -#define MAXNPROCS	 100000	/* Coldfire can't deal with 1000000 */
> > -#endif
> > -#define MAXNREPS	100000
> > +#define MAXNPROCS	10000 	/*These should be sufficient*/
> > +#define MAXNREPS	10000	/*Else they srewup the system
> > un-necessarily*/
> >  #define FAIL		1
> >  #define PASS		0
> >  
> > 
> > ---
> > Regards--
> > Subrata
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ltp-list mailing list
> > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> 
> -- 
> /---------------------------------------\
> | Name: Caspar Zhang                    |
> | Team: Kernel-QE                       |
> | IRC: czhang @ #kernel-qe, #eng-china  |
> | Phone: +86-10-6260-8150               |
> | Cellphone: +86-1381-073-0090          |
> \---------------------------------------/
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

-- 
Thanks & Regards
Rishi
LTP Maintainer
IBM, LTC, Bangalore
Please join IRC #ltp @ irc.freenode.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-20 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-19 12:35 [LTP] [PATCH] Fix MSGCTL10() to avoid un-necessary cluttering of whole system with all PIDs Subrata Modak
2010-04-20 10:00 ` Caspar ZHANG
2010-04-20 10:38   ` Rishikesh K Rajak [this message]
     [not found] <239293073.562841271760559982.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-04-20 10:49 ` Caspar ZHANG
2010-04-20 11:47   ` Rishikesh K Rajak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100420103825.GA4118@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=czhang@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox