Re: [LTP] abort01 testcase cleanup

[Nicolas Joly <njoly@pasteur.fr>]

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 03:03:45PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:56:58AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Nicolas Joly <njoly@pasteur.fr> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> The attached patch do some cleanup in the abort01 testcase ...
> >>> 
> >>> 1) The attempt to remove the generated core is wrong. The hard-coded
> >>>   `core' name is bad and the test temporary directory removal already
> >>>   take care of this.
> >>> 
> >>> 2) Make the test fail gracefully if the running environment does not
> >>>   allow generating core files.
> >>> 
> >>> njoly@lanfeust [syscalls/abort]> ./abort01
> >>> abort01     1  TPASS  :  Test passed
> >>> njoly@lanfeust [syscalls/abort]> (ulimit -c 0 && ./abort01)
> >>> abort01     1  TCONF  :  core file size limit must be greater than 0.
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Joly <njoly@pasteur.fr>
> >> 
> >> Looks ok, but is there any particular reason why you removed the unlink(2) call?
> > 
> > The `unlink("core")' one ?
> > 
> > Well, at least RHEL do use `proc.<pid>' when generating core file
> > names ... Not speaking about admins that might have configured it to
> > use another scheme.
> > 
> > IMO, relying on a specific name, for a configurable system, is a bad
> > idea; and can only lead to problems.
> > 
> > By example, this test from mkdir09.c cannot succeed on most RHEL
> > systems:
> > 
> >        /* Check for core file in test directory. */
> >        if (access("core", 0) == 0) {
> >                tst_resm(TWARN, "\tCore file found in test directory.");
> >                tst_exit();
> >        }
> 
> Yeah. Perhaps it might be a good idea to integrate a tool into LTP which detects corefile names, like what's described here: http://aplawrence.com/Linux/limit_core_files.html .

If there is a real need, why not; but for the current use in syscall
testcases, it seems a little overkill.

testcases/kernel/syscalls/abort/abort01.c
testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/kill11.c
testcases/kernel/syscalls/mallopt/mallopt01.c
testcases/kernel/syscalls/waitpid/waitpid02.c
testcases/kernel/syscalls/waitpid/waitpid05.c
  Remove core files that may have been created during the test
  ... The temp test directory removal can/do already remove them.

testcases/kernel/syscalls/mkdir/mkdir09.c
testcases/kernel/syscalls/setrlimit/setrlimit01.c
  Check that a childs does not have created a core file
  ... Could be tested from child process status instead.

-- 
Nicolas Joly

Biological Software and Databanks.
Institut Pasteur, Paris.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list