From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PItWv-00078z-Bs for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:43:17 +0000 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1PItWu-0007dF-Gv for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:43:17 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oAI1Vo0J024967 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:31:50 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id oAI1h7n3224688 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:43:07 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oAI1h7fD031636 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:43:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:43:03 -0800 From: James Takahashi Message-ID: <20101118014303.GA30825@us.ibm.com> References: <4CDAA3CA020000E80006AF93@novprvoes0310.provo.novell.com> <1289458673.5622.19.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1289458673.5622.19.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC] Remove testcases/pounder21 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: LTP list Cc: "iranna.ankad" , takahash > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Murlin Wenzel wrote: > > > > Answering my own question: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09788.html > > , I asked this earlier on this year and someone replied saying "don't > > remove it". If it's not removed and serves a particular purpose, maybe > > it should be moved to a different section of the tree to avoid > > confusion in the future (in particular if it's a framework and not > > actually a test / test suite). Yeah, that was me. I now understand that the LTP Makefile reorganization from earlier in the year attempts to recursively build everything that lives under 'testcases' due to the (reasonable) assumption that everything in 'testcases' is a subtest to be executed under LTP control. 'pounder', however, is not a subtest to be executed under LTP control. It is a separate test execution framework, and in fact, executes LTP's 'runltp' as a subtest within that framework. This allows us to run other standalone tests, test suites, and/or benchmarks along side LTP. I agree that it would make sense to move pounder21 to some other place in the tree. At first glance, 'utils' looks like a reasonable spot. Thoughts? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list