From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U4uWJ-0006A6-NE for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:38:11 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:38:38 +0100 From: chrubis@suse.cz Message-ID: <20130211143838.GA2829@rei> References: <50C08A4C.1090402@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50C08A4C.1090402@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] open posix testsuite and names of testcases List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jan Stancek Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Hi! Just recently I've found that one of the posix tests stays running after the testsuite has exited (is reparented to init and runs happily ever after). Which is another usecase for this rename. But the original patch was rather hack (and it doesn't work for me anyway). So what about renaming the sources itself? Do we agree on this? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list