From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0Z6-0003qM-1R for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:43:12 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:43:52 +0100 From: chrubis@suse.cz Message-ID: <20130319174351.GA1678@rei> References: <1437086244.21063924.1363705319128.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <623806259.21081036.1363706313082.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <623806259.21081036.1363706313082.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] Coverity report for ltp-20130109 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jan Stancek Cc: LTP List Hi! > I ran it for current LTP stable (20130109) (on top of RHEL6.4) > and I'm sharing results here: > http://jan.stancek.eu/coverity/ltp-20130109-1.el6.err.xz I've looked at the results briefly and allready found and fixed one (quite stupid) bug in doio.c. But there seems to be quite a number of false possitives because LTP does things that are usually wrong intentionally (i.e. NULL dereference). We could probably mask most of the cases from the compiler by setting such variables as volatile, but I'm not really sure if it's worth of it. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list