public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chrubis@suse.cz
To: DAN LI <li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LTP list <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH]syscalls/adjtimex: Test for mode ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:44:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418174406.GA1425@rei.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516F7F88.30707@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hi!
>  #if defined UCLINUX && !__THROW
>  /* workaround for libc bug causing failure in sys/timex.h */
> @@ -74,20 +35,19 @@
>  #include "test.h"
>  #include "usctest.h"
> 
> -#define SET_MODE ( ADJ_OFFSET | ADJ_FREQUENCY | ADJ_MAXERROR | ADJ_ESTERROR | \
> -	ADJ_STATUS | ADJ_TIMECONST | ADJ_TICK )
> +#define SET_MODE (ADJ_OFFSET | ADJ_FREQUENCY | ADJ_MAXERROR | ADJ_ESTERROR | \
> +	ADJ_STATUS | ADJ_TIMECONST | ADJ_TICK)
> 
> -static void setup();
> -static void cleanup();
> +static void setup(void);
> +static void cleanup(void);
> 
>  char *TCID = "adjtimex01";
> -int TST_TOTAL = 1;
> +int TST_TOTAL = 2;
> 
>  static struct timex tim_save;
> 
>  int main(int ac, char **av)
>  {
> -
>  	int lc;
>  	char *msg;
> 
> @@ -106,7 +66,26 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  		TEST(adjtimex(&tim_save));
> 
>  		if ((TEST_RETURN >= 0) && (TEST_RETURN <= 5)) {
> -			tst_resm(TPASS, "adjtimex() returned %ld", TEST_RETURN);
> +			tst_resm(TPASS, "adjtimex() with mode %u returned %ld",
> +				 SET_MODE, TEST_RETURN);
> +		} else {
> +			tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "Test Failed, adjtimex()"
> +				 "returned %ld", TEST_RETURN);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> +
> +		tst_count = 0;
> +
> +		/* Call adjtimex(2) */
> +		tim_save.modes = ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT;
> +
> +		TEST(adjtimex(&tim_save));
> +
> +		if ((TEST_RETURN >= 0) && (TEST_RETURN <= 5)) {
> +			tst_resm(TPASS, "adjtimex() with mode %u returned %ld",
> +				 ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT, TEST_RETURN);
>  		} else {
>  			tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "Test Failed, adjtimex()"
>  				 "returned %ld", TEST_RETURN);

I think that doing the test loop twice would fail at least for '-i' and
'-I'. My guess is that the second loop would not be exectuted at all.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

      reply	other threads:[~2013-04-18 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-18  5:07 [LTP] [PATCH]syscalls/adjtimex: Test for mode ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT DAN LI
2013-04-18 17:44 ` chrubis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130418174406.GA1425@rei.suse.cz \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox