From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UsAmZ-0002Fc-No for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:54:35 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:56:02 +0200 From: chrubis@suse.cz Message-ID: <20130627115602.GA5384@rei> References: <1372208571-9642-1-git-send-email-sedat.dilek@gmail.com> <20130626132415.GB16146@rei.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] runtest: Add new syscalls-ipc test-suite List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Sedat Dilek Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Hi! > > Yeah, I had that in mind, but as the included test-cases hit other > > areas I thought about "syscallc-ipc". > > Might be a good choice for IPC testers to have all tests in runtest/ipc file. > > I am OK with that. > > > > Shall I send a v2? Yes, please. > Where shall I put the syscalls-ipc test-cases - at the end? > ...and place some comments? I would do so and I would add short comment before the newly added ones that these were added from syscalls or so. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list