From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UsBvO-0000Ab-BL for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:07:46 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:09:18 +0200 From: chrubis@suse.cz Message-ID: <20130627130917.GA21389@rei> References: <1372336933-2770-1-git-send-email-sedat.dilek@gmail.com> <51CC37E2.20304@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51CC37E2.20304@ti.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] runtest/ipc: Add some IPC syscalls test-cases List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Carlos Hernandez Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Hi! > > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek > > --- > > runtest/ipc | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) > > NAK. Duplication is generally a bad idea. > This have the side effect of running the same tests twice for people > that run ipc and syscalls test scenarios. Hmm, this is a valid point. Thinking of the ideal way, it may be more data driven framework with a list of all tests anotated with some group labels. I noted this for the planned testdriver rewrite. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list