From: chrubis@suse.cz
To: Carlos Hernandez <ceh@ti.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] runtest/ipc: Add some IPC syscalls test-cases
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:28:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130627132857.GB21560@rei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CC3C3B.2020803@ti.com>
Hi!
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek<sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> runtest/ipc | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
> >> NAK. Duplication is generally a bad idea.
> >> This have the side effect of running the same tests twice for people
> >> that run ipc and syscalls test scenarios.
> > Hmm, this is a valid point.
> >
> > Thinking of the ideal way, it may be more data driven framework with a
> > list of all tests anotated with some group labels. I noted this for the
> > planned testdriver rewrite.
> >
>
> We can easily support this with existing infrastructure if we add some
> structure to the test case tags.
> For instance on runtest/syscalls, one could use:
> msgctl01_ipc
> msgctl02_ipc
> ...
>
> Then when calling runltp, one can use -s option to filter tests cases,
> e.g. ./runltp -f syscalls -s '*_ipc'
>
> At Texas Instruments we use following convention for TAG names
> <AREA>_<SCOPE>_<TYPE>_<ID>
>
>
That is no go, at least here we have database of testruns for different
distributions and renaming the testcases tags will break the regression
detection. So I would preffer solution that adds a metadata without
renaming the current test tags. The problem is that ltp-pan and runltp
are so horribly outdated and unmaintaned that adding functionality to
these is out of question.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1372336933-2770-1-git-send-email-sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <51CC37E2.20304@ti.com>
2013-06-27 13:09 ` [LTP] [PATCH] runtest/ipc: Add some IPC syscalls test-cases chrubis
[not found] ` <51CC3C3B.2020803@ti.com>
2013-06-27 13:28 ` chrubis [this message]
[not found] ` <CA+icZUW2hCKtEV-yvYSDrnuVW=MmB0ywTvKTPnStqWgmiAhKmg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-27 13:24 ` chrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130627132857.GB21560@rei \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ceh@ti.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox