From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WAg4a-0002PF-Dj for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:29:56 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:29:22 +0100 From: chrubis@suse.cz Message-ID: <20140204132922.GA6597@rei> References: <1387171228-505-1-git-send-email-xu.simon@oracle.com> <52BA3898.3050909@oracle.com> <52DDD0ED.6040702@oracle.com> <2085388669.1674106.1391081515715.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2085388669.1674106.1391081515715.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sctp: Avoid using file descriptor 0 to get ENOTSOCK List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jan Stancek Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Hi! > Given that this is identical to c43ead6daa0b9ae5763d6cf3d21357a789651417 from > https://github.com/borkmann/lksctp-tools : > > Acked-by: Jan Stancek I would be tempted to put the repeated code fragemnts into single place (header included by all of the testcases). But given that the patch is in upstream I'm OK with applying it in LTP as well. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list