public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chrubis@suse.cz
To: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] lib/tst_path_has_mnt_flags.c: create a function tst_path_has_mnt_flags()
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:52:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409125222.GA22137@rei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472091851.2162463.1397039648410.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>

Hi!
> This function looks OK for one testcase that needs to check for
> OR logic between flags. I was thinking, whether we should change
> this function to return number matched flags. That way we could
> also check easily for AND logic (matches all flags) if we need
> that in future.

I was going to suggest this as well.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment 
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-09 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-03 12:00 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/tst_path_has_mnt_flags.c: create a function tst_path_has_mnt_flags() gux.fnst
2014-04-03 12:00 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] openat/openat02.c: add a new case to test flags gux.fnst
2014-04-04 10:01 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/tst_path_has_mnt_flags.c: create a function tst_path_has_mnt_flags() Jan Stancek
2014-04-09  2:26   ` gux.fnst
2014-04-09  3:46 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3] " gux.fnst
2014-04-09 10:34   ` Jan Stancek
2014-04-09 12:52     ` chrubis [this message]
2014-04-11  6:22     ` gux.fnst
2014-04-11  7:54 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] " gux.fnst
2014-04-11  7:54   ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] openat/openat02.c: add a new case to test flags gux.fnst
2014-05-14 15:40     ` chrubis
2014-05-06 17:26   ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib/tst_path_has_mnt_flags.c: create a function tst_path_has_mnt_flags() chrubis
2014-05-08  9:50 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 " Xing Gu
2014-05-08  9:50   ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 2/2] openat/openat02.c: add a new case to test flags Xing Gu
2014-05-14 13:15   ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/2] lib/tst_path_has_mnt_flags.c: create a function tst_path_has_mnt_flags() chrubis
2014-05-14 13:35     ` chrubis
2014-05-14 13:46       ` chrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140409125222.GA22137@rei \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox