From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WXs02-0003DO-La for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:53:06 +0000 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:52:22 +0200 From: chrubis@suse.cz Message-ID: <20140409125222.GA22137@rei> References: <1396526450-22885-1-git-send-email-gux.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1397015193-18623-1-git-send-email-gux.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <472091851.2162463.1397039648410.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <472091851.2162463.1397039648410.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] lib/tst_path_has_mnt_flags.c: create a function tst_path_has_mnt_flags() List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jan Stancek Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Hi! > This function looks OK for one testcase that needs to check for > OR logic between flags. I was thinking, whether we should change > this function to return number matched flags. That way we could > also check easily for AND logic (matches all flags) if we need > that in future. I was going to suggest this as well. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud. http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list