From: chrubis@suse.cz
To: Zeng Linggang <zenglg.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] readdir/readdir03.c: add new error number testes
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 18:32:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140505163249.GD11256@rei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396350731.10607.12.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
Hi!
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readdir/readdir03.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Fujitsu Ltd.
> + * Author: Zeng Linggang <zenglg.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU Library General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
> + *
> + */
> +/*
> + * Test Description:
> + * Verify that,
> + * 1. Creat a directory and open it, then delete the directory, ENOENT would
> + * return.
> + * 2. File descriptor does not refer to a directory, ENOTDIR would return.
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <limits.h>
> +#include <dirent.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include "test.h"
> +#include "usctest.h"
> +#include "safe_macros.h"
> +
> +char *TCID = "readdir03";
> +
> +#if !defined __x86_64__
Why is the test disabled on x86_64? What about other 64 bit
architectures?
> +#define TEST_DIR "test_dir"
> +#define TEST_FILE "test_file"
> +#define DIR_MODE (S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|S_IXUSR|S_IRGRP| \
> + S_IXGRP|S_IROTH|S_IXOTH)
> +
> +struct old_linux_dirent {
> + long d_ino;
> + off_t d_off;
> + unsigned short d_reclen;
> + char d_name[NAME_MAX+1];
> +};
> +
> +static unsigned int del_dir_fd, file_fd;
> +static struct old_linux_dirent dirp;
> +static void setup(void);
> +static void cleanup(void);
> +
> +static struct test_case_t {
> + unsigned int *fd;
> + struct old_linux_dirent *dirp;
> + unsigned int count;
> + int exp_errno;
> +} test_cases[] = {
> + {&del_dir_fd, &dirp, sizeof(struct old_linux_dirent), ENOENT},
> + {&file_fd, &dirp, sizeof(struct old_linux_dirent), ENOTDIR},
> +};
> +
> +int TST_TOTAL = ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases);
> +static int exp_enos[] = { ENOENT, ENOTDIR, 0 };
> +static void readdir_verify(const struct test_case_t *);
> +
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + int i, lc;
> + char *msg;
> +
> + msg = parse_opts(argc, argv, NULL, NULL);
> + if (msg != NULL)
> + tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "OPTION PARSING ERROR - %s", msg);
> +
> + setup();
> +
> + for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> + tst_count = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < TST_TOTAL; i++)
> + readdir_verify(&test_cases[i]);
> + }
> +
> + cleanup();
> + tst_exit();
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
> +
> + TEST_EXP_ENOS(exp_enos);
> +
> + TEST_PAUSE;
> +
> + tst_tmpdir();
> +
> + SAFE_MKDIR(cleanup, TEST_DIR, DIR_MODE);
> + del_dir_fd = SAFE_OPEN(cleanup, TEST_DIR, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY);
> + if (rmdir(TEST_DIR) == -1)
> + tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "rmdir failed");
> +
> + file_fd = SAFE_OPEN(cleanup, TEST_FILE, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0777);
> +}
> +
> +static void readdir_verify(const struct test_case_t *test)
> +{
> + TEST(syscall(__NR_readdir, *test->fd, test->dirp, test->count));
So you are using raw readdir() syscall (man 2 readdir) instead of the
glibc readdir() (man 3 readdir).
Are you aware that the rest of the readdir testcases use the glibc
readdir()?
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-05 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-01 11:12 [LTP] [PATCH] readdir/readdir03.c: add new error number testes Zeng Linggang
2014-05-05 16:32 ` chrubis [this message]
[not found] ` <1399373430.3177.55.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-05-06 11:00 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <1399427555.2397.8.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-05-07 9:09 ` chrubis
[not found] ` <1399459901.2397.18.camel@G08JYZSD130126>
2014-05-07 12:58 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] readdir/readdir21.c: " chrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140505163249.GD11256@rei \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zenglg.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox