From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XRksp-0008Iy-Sx for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:36:39 +0000 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:36:23 +0200 From: chrubis@suse.cz Message-ID: <20140910163623.GD16633@rei> References: <1407309452.2223.13.camel@G08JYZSD130126> <20140909144034.GA6108@rei> <1410317916.31685.34.camel@G08JYZSD130126> <1095333434.20418604.1410337882836.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1095333434.20418604.1410337882836.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] securebits/check_keepcaps.c: Add comments about cap_get_flag may return -1 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jan Stancek Cc: ltp-list Hi! > > I think libcap was compiled with wrong kernel headers and it is a bug in > > distribution. I had installed these packages all from the default > > distribution. The value of CAP_LAST_CAP is different. > > Someone else reported it already: > Bug 1046008 - Some capabilities aren't be defined > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046008 > > Patch looks good to me, it makes the bug more visible. Ok. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list