From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Xx7b6-0008Tr-El for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 05:08:00 +0000 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1Xx7b5-00050G-G9 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 05:08:00 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 22:07:53 -0700 Received: from b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.19]) by d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E5C3E4003D for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 22:07:51 -0700 (MST) Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sB657piw21954632 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 22:07:51 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sB657ptS023404 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 22:07:51 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([9.125.6.247]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id sB657oEU023314 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 22:07:50 -0700 Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 09:24:22 +0800 From: Han Pingtian Message-ID: <20141206012422.GA3352@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [LTP] questions about getrusage04 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Hey, I cannot understand why udelta/sdelta > "1000+(BIAS_MAX*factor_nr)" is a problem. Could any expert give me a explain, please? And looks like with this patch applied, it works well on powerpc: diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage04.c index 3640295..f118288 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage04.c +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage04.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) if (msg != NULL) tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "OPTION PARSING ERROR - %s", msg); -#if (__powerpc__) || (__powerpc64__) || (__s390__) || (__s390x__) +#if (__s390__) || (__s390x__) tst_brkm(TCONF, NULL, "This test is not designed for current system"); #endif although the initial git comment said that "accuracy on powerpc and s390x systems is always 10ms". Thanks in advance! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list