From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [patch V2 00/20] timer: Refactor the timer wheel
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:28:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160622102858.GA13962@rei.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1606221037310.5839@nanos>
Hi!
> > rtbox:~ # /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/sigtimedwait/sigtimedwait_1-1.run-test
> > Test FAILED: sigtimedwait() did not return in the required time
> > time_elapsed: 1.197057
> > ...come on, you can do it...
> > rtbox:~ # /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/sigtimedwait/sigtimedwait_1-1.run-test
> > Test PASSED
> >
> > #define ERRORMARGIN 0.1
> > ...
> > if ((time_elapsed > SIGTIMEDWAITSEC + ERRORMARGIN)
> > || (time_elapsed < SIGTIMEDWAITSEC - ERRORMARGIN)) {
> > printf("Test FAILED: sigtimedwait() did not return in "
> > "the required time\n");
> > printf("time_elapsed: %lf\n", time_elapsed);
> > return PTS_FAIL;
> > }
> >
> > Looks hohum to me, but gripe did arrive with patch set, so you get a note.
>
> hohum is a euphemism. That's completely bogus.
>
> The only guarantee a syscall with timers has is: timer does not fire early.
While this is true, checking with reasonable error margin works just
fine 99% of the time. You cannot really test that timer expires, without
setting arbitrary margin.
Looking into POSIX sigtimedwait() timer should run on CLOCK_MONOTONIC so
we can call clock_getres(CLOCK_MONOTOINC, ...) double or tripple the
value and use it for error margin. And also fix the test to use
the CLOCK_MONOTONIC timer.
And of course the error margin must not be used when we check that the
elapsed time wasn't shorter than we expected.
Does that sound reasonable?
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160617121134.417319325@linutronix.de>
[not found] ` <1466581044.3188.34.camel@gmail.com>
2016-06-22 8:44 ` [LTP] [patch V2 00/20] timer: Refactor the timer wheel Thomas Gleixner
2016-06-22 9:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-06-22 13:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-06-22 10:28 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2016-06-23 8:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-06-23 11:47 ` Cyril Hrubis
[not found] ` <20160623135803.636.qmail@ns.sciencehorizons.net>
2016-06-23 14:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-06-23 15:11 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-06-23 15:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-06-23 16:31 ` Cyril Hrubis
[not found] ` <20160626190025.GC11162@amd>
2016-06-26 19:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160622102858.GA13962@rei.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox