From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:28:55 +0800
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] mkfs01: extend the loop device size to 256M
In-Reply-To: <20160727092210.GB10645@rei.lan>
References: <1469598247-23993-1-git-send-email-liwang@redhat.com>
 <1469598247-23993-2-git-send-email-liwang@redhat.com>
 <20160727092210.GB10645@rei.lan>
Message-ID: <20160727102855.GA19654@gmail.com>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:22:10AM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh b/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh
> > index eda9829..9a26899 100755
> > --- a/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh
> > +++ b/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh
> > @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ setup()
> >  
> >  	tst_tmpdir
> >  
> > -	tst_acquire_device
> > +	# set test_dev.img size
> > +	tst_acquire_device 256
> 
> As far as I can tell 150MB should suffice as well, at least for me the
> btrfs-progs v4.3.1+ requests at least 136MB. Or did they increase the
> minimal size again?

No, I just let to 256M in case that they increase that again.

> 
> And I guess that we should bump the size in runltp script as well.

I didn't think of that.

Ok, Let me think it over and rewrite a new method.

Regards,
Li Wang