From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:33:07 +0100 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] ltp/numa: add new test11 In-Reply-To: <1484898966-27753-1-git-send-email-liwang@redhat.com> References: <1484898966-27753-1-git-send-email-liwang@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20170124193307.GA780@rei> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi! > +# Verification of hugepage memory allocated on a node > +test11() > +{ > + Mem_huge=0 > + > + if [ ! -d "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/" ]; then > + tst_brk TCONF "hugepage is not supported" This should be tst_res followed by a return on a next line. The tst_brk will exit the whole test just because hugepages are not supported. > + fi > + > + for node in $nodes_list; do > + Ori_hpgs=$(cat /sys/devices/system/node/node${node}/hugepages/hugepages-${HPAGE_SIZE}kB/nr_hugepages) > + echo 1 >/sys/devices/system/node/node${node}/hugepages/hugepages-${HPAGE_SIZE}kB/nr_hugepages Uh, so this sysfs knob controlls how much hugepages can be allocated on a node right? What if it was set to nonzero and some hugepages are allocated already? Shouldn't we rather set it to current value + 1 ? > + numactl --cpunodebind=$node --membind=$node support_numa $HUGE_PAGE & > + pid=$! > + wait_for_support_numa $pid > + > + Mem_huge=$(echo $(numastat -p $pid |grep '^Huge' |awk '{print $'$((node+2))'}')) > + Mem_huge=$(echo "$Mem_huge * 1024" |bc) Eh, why not just $((Mem_huge * 1024)) ? > + if [ $(echo "$Mem_huge < $HPAGE_SIZE" | bc) -eq 1 ]; then Here as well, why not just if [ "$Mem_huge" -lt "$HPAGE_SIZE" ]; then > + tst_res TFAIL \ > + "NUMA memory allocated in node$node is less than expected" > + return > + fi > + > + kill -CONT $pid >/dev/null 2>&1 > + echo $Ori_hpgs >/sys/devices/system/node/node${node}/hugepages/hugepages-${HPAGE_SIZE}kB/nr_hugepages > + done > + > + tst_res TPASS "NUMA local node hugepage memory allocated" > +} > + > tst_run > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/numa/support_numa.c b/testcases/kernel/numa/support_numa.c > index eaf63e3..0241a19 100644 > --- a/testcases/kernel/numa/support_numa.c > +++ b/testcases/kernel/numa/support_numa.c > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ > /* */ > /* File: support_numa.c */ > /* */ > -/* Description: Allocates 1MB of memory and touches it to verify numa */ > +/* Description: Allocates memory and touches it to verify numa */ > /* */ > /* Author: Sivakumar Chinnaiah Sivakumar.C@in.ibm.com */ > /* */ > @@ -52,16 +52,43 @@ static void help(void) > printf("Input: Describe input arguments to this program\n"); > printf(" argv[1] == 1 then allocate 1MB of memory\n"); > printf(" argv[1] == 2 then allocate 1MB of share memory\n"); > - printf(" argv[1] == 3 then pause the program to catch sigint\n"); > + printf(" argv[1] == 3 then allocate 1HUGE PAGE SIZE of memory\n"); > + printf(" argv[1] == 4 then pause the program to catch sigint\n"); > printf("Exit: On failure - Exits with non-zero value\n"); > printf(" On success - exits with 0 exit value\n"); > > exit(1); > } > > +static int read_hugepagesize(void) > +{ > + FILE *fp; > + char line[BUFSIZ], buf[BUFSIZ]; > + int val; > + > + fp = fopen("/proc/meminfo", "r"); > + if (fp == NULL) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Failed to open /proc/meminfo"); > + return 1; > + } > + > + while (fgets(line, BUFSIZ, fp) != NULL) { > + if (sscanf(line, "%64s %d", buf, &val) == 2) > + if (strcmp(buf, "Hugepagesize:") == 0) { > + fclose(fp); > + return 1024 * val; > + } > + } > + > + fclose(fp); > + fprintf(stderr, "can't find \"%s\" in %s", "Hugepagesize:", "/proc/meminfo"); > + > + return 1; > +} We should rather return 0 on a failure so that we can easily check hpsz != 0 in the main() > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > - int i, fd, rc; > + int i, fd, rc, hpsz; > char *buf = NULL; > struct stat sb; > > @@ -114,6 +141,24 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > remove(TEST_SFILE); > break; > case 3: > + hpsz = read_hugepagesize(); Eh, we do not check for a failure and gracefully try to allocate 1 byte here? That does not sound right. > + buf = mmap(NULL, hpsz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, > + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB, > + -1, 0); > + > + if (buf == MAP_FAILED){ > + fprintf(stderr, "mmap failed\n"); What about errno? We should rather use perror() here. Also coding style is wrong, you should use checkpatch.pl to check for common mistakes. > + exit(1); > + } > + > + memset(buf, 'a', hpsz); > + > + raise(SIGSTOP); > + > + munmap(buf, hpsz); > + break; > + case 4: > raise(SIGSTOP); > break; > default: > -- > 1.8.3.1 > -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz