From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] madvise07.c:72: FAIL: Did not receive SIGBUS
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:43:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213134307.0bb5fab0@linux-v3j5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170213090837.GA16973@rei.lan>
Hello Li & Metan,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:08:37 +0100
"Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
> > I'm trying to run ltp on upstream kernel-4.10.0-rc7, and found that
> > madvise07 always failing with no SIGBUS received when mmap the PRIVATE
> > memory. I hope to know if there're some relevant stuff about this
> > issue.
> > Any discussion or document for that?
>
> Looks like a plain old kernel bug to me.
Sorry, I have to admit that I knew this fails, but did not follow it up before
submitting the patch! don't know whether it is a bug, or if MADV_HWPOISON is
not intended to work with private memory. I would assume that it is a bug
judging by the man pages.
>
> > # uname -r
> > 4.10.0-rc7
> >
> > # ./madvise07
> > tst_test.c:794: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > madvise07.c:57: INFO: madvise(0x7f25bdd7e000, 4096, MADV_HWPOISON)
> > madvise07.c:72: FAIL: Did not receive SIGBUS after accessing
> > MAP_PRIVATE memory marked with MADV_HWPOISON
>
> If you reach this TFAIL the child wasn't killed with a signal after it
> accessed memory marked with MADV_HWPOISON.
>
> What hardware is this?
>
> > madvise07.c:57: INFO: madvise(0x7f25bdd7e000, 4096, MADV_HWPOISON)
> > madvise07.c:90: PASS: madvise(..., MADV_HWPOISON) on MAP_SHARED memory
>
I know that it fails on x86_64 and ppc64le.
Thank you,
Richard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-10 2:53 [LTP] madvise07.c:72: FAIL: Did not receive SIGBUS Li Wang
2017-02-13 9:08 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-13 12:43 ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2017-02-14 14:06 ` Jan Stancek
2017-02-14 15:18 ` Richard Palethorpe
2017-02-14 15:25 ` Jan Stancek
2017-02-15 9:38 ` Li Wang
2017-02-15 9:45 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170213134307.0bb5fab0@linux-v3j5 \
--to=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox