public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] madvise07.c:72: FAIL: Did not receive SIGBUS
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:43:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213134307.0bb5fab0@linux-v3j5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170213090837.GA16973@rei.lan>

Hello Li & Metan,

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:08:37 +0100
"Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:

> Hi!
> > I'm trying to run ltp on upstream kernel-4.10.0-rc7, and found that
> > madvise07 always failing with no SIGBUS received when mmap the PRIVATE
> > memory. I hope to know if there're some relevant stuff about this
> > issue.
> > Any discussion or document for that?  
> 
> Looks like a plain old kernel bug to me.

Sorry, I have to admit that I knew this fails, but did not follow it up before
submitting the patch! don't know whether it is a bug, or if MADV_HWPOISON is
not intended to work with private memory. I would assume that it is a bug
judging by the man pages.

> 
> > # uname -r
> > 4.10.0-rc7
> > 
> > # ./madvise07
> > tst_test.c:794: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > madvise07.c:57: INFO: madvise(0x7f25bdd7e000, 4096, MADV_HWPOISON)
> > madvise07.c:72: FAIL: Did not receive SIGBUS after accessing
> > MAP_PRIVATE memory marked with MADV_HWPOISON  
> 
> If you reach this TFAIL the child wasn't killed with a signal after it
> accessed memory marked with MADV_HWPOISON.
> 
> What hardware is this?
> 
> > madvise07.c:57: INFO: madvise(0x7f25bdd7e000, 4096, MADV_HWPOISON)
> > madvise07.c:90: PASS: madvise(..., MADV_HWPOISON) on MAP_SHARED memory  
> 

I know that it fails on x86_64 and ppc64le.

Thank you,
Richard.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-13 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-10  2:53 [LTP] madvise07.c:72: FAIL: Did not receive SIGBUS Li Wang
2017-02-13  9:08 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-13 12:43   ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2017-02-14 14:06   ` Jan Stancek
2017-02-14 15:18     ` Richard Palethorpe
2017-02-14 15:25       ` Jan Stancek
2017-02-15  9:38     ` Li Wang
2017-02-15  9:45       ` Li Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170213134307.0bb5fab0@linux-v3j5 \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox