public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC] [PATCH] lib32: Add support for linking 32bit programs on 64bit
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:55:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170328165536.741d14e5@linux-v3j5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170328100114.29730-1-chrubis@suse.cz>

Hi Metan!

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:01:14 +0200
"Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:

> This is proof of concept for building 32bit testcases on 64bit platform.

Great thanks! I have tried running it and have a couple of minor issues.

> 
> What we do is:
> 
> * Configure test if compiler supports -m32
>   TODO: Does 32bit compiler accept -m32?
>         If so, we should fail the test on 32bit
> 	platforms by default.
> 
> * The directory lib32 contains symlinks of minimal set of sources
>   needed to link newlib testcase + Makefile.

Apparently missing safe_socket which is required for cve-2016-4997.c, but that
is easy to fix I suppose.

> 
> * The testcases.mk builds 32bit library as well if
>   32bit compiler was installed (-m32 configure test was succesful)
> 
> * And finally the env_post.mk switches between lib and lib32 depeding
>   on if -m32 was passed in the CFLAGS

I added "cve-2016-4997: CFLAGS += -m32" and it still tried to look in
"../../lib"

> +ifeq ($(filter -m32,$(CFLAGS)),)
>  LDFLAGS				+= -L$(top_builddir)/lib
> +else
> +LDFLAGS				+= -L$(top_builddir)/lib32
> +endif

I was able to remove the if statement (i.e. put both dirs on the search path)
and the 64-bit tests still compiled fine and so did the 32-bit test, although
maybe not all linkers can be trusted to ignore libs with the wrong number of
bits.

Thank you,
Richard.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-28 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-28 10:01 [LTP] [RFC] [PATCH] lib32: Add support for linking 32bit programs on 64bit Cyril Hrubis
2017-03-28 14:55 ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2017-03-28 15:33   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-03-28 15:46     ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-03-29  9:37       ` Richard Palethorpe
2017-03-29  8:36 ` Jan Stancek
2017-03-29  9:12   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-03-29 12:48 ` Richard Palethorpe
2017-03-29 14:56   ` Richard Palethorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170328165536.741d14e5@linux-v3j5 \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox